Max Purcell vs Brayden Schnur — Busan CH Round of 32

Busan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 May 2019
hard
CAN3
Brayden Schnur
31 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLW
Purcell M.
6-4 6-3
Schnur B.
Purcell M.
662
Schnur B.
430

Max Purcell defeated Brayden Schnur 6-4 6-3 in the Busan CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Max Purcell came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 16. Max Purcell extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Max Purcell closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-08-07Canada MastersQ2hardMax Purcell6-2 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Schnur B.

Schnur B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Schnur B.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.6
6.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 163). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Purcell M.Schnur B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
27
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
86
Break points won·Slight edge
10
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
84
14
Tiebreaks·Even
81
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Berankis R.[1]
Harris A.
7-656-2
Semi-finals
Harris A.
Santillan A.
5-77-662-1
Berankis R.[1]
Uchiyama Y.[16]
6-27-5
Quarter-finals
Uchiyama Y.[16]
Ito T.[10]
4-66-06-3
Berankis R.[1]
Chung Y.
5-76-36-4
Harris A.
Donskoy E.[7]
6-47-65
Santillan A.
Soeda G.[15]
6-36-3
R16
Berankis R.[1]
Lee D.
6-33-66-3
Soeda G.[15]
Uchida K.
6-46-3
Santillan A.
Yang T.
7-696-1
Harris A.
Purcell M.
6-44-66-2
Donskoy E.[7]
King E.
6-27-63
Ito T.[10]
Ilkel C.
7-56-766-4
Uchiyama Y.[16]
Lacko L.[4]
3-66-46-0
Chung Y.
Baghdatis M.[6]
6-26-3
R32
Baghdatis M.[6]
Sela D.
4-66-26-2
Soeda G.[15]
Wu D.
6-16-1
Ito T.[10]
Wu T.
6-47-62
Harris A.
Moriya H.[14]
7-56-3
Yang T.
Kwon S.[11]
6-37-612
Santillan A.
Jung J.[5]
6-33-66-2
Purcell M.
Schnur B.[3]
6-46-3
Donskoy E.[7]
Mukund S.
6-26-1
Ilkel C.
Ramanathan R.[8]
6-17-60
Uchiyama Y.[16]
Banes M.
6-46-2
Lacko L.[4]
Saville L.
3-66-36-4
Chung Y.
Milojevic N.[9]
6-23-67-5
Berankis R.[1]
Broady L.
1-67-676-4
King E.
Bemelmans R.[12]
6-747-57-68
Uchida K.
Stakhovsky S.[2]
7-686-3
Lee D.
Sugita Y.[13]
5-76-37-63
R64
Broady L.
Xia Z.
7-56-1
Uchida K.
Hong S.
6-27-5
Wu D.
Smith R.
6-33-66-1
Yang T.
King K.
6-36-4
Santillan A.
Setkic A.
6-26-2
Purcell M.
Peliwo F.
6-46-3
Harris A.
Robert S.
6-46-2
King E.
Song M.
3-66-36-2
Mukund S.
Myneni S.
7-673-67-5
Ilkel C.
Nam J.
6-47-62
Wu T.
Neuchrist M.
7-627-5
Banes M.
Kim C.
6-17-68
Saville L.
Kim Y.
6-16-0
Sela D.
Song E.
3-66-36-3
Chung Y.
Li Z.
3-66-36-4
Lee D.
Ochi M.
7-636-4