Filip Horansky vs Vaclav Safranek — Rome CH Round of 32

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SVK9
Filip Horansky
33 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 May 2019
clay
CZE
Vaclav Safranek
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
Horansky F.
6-3 4-6 6-3
Safranek V.
Horansky F.
6462
Safranek V.
3631

Filip Horansky defeated Vaclav Safranek 6-3 4-6 6-3 in the Rome CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Vaclav Safranek came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Filip Horansky closed it out in three sets, 6–3 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Horansky F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Safranek V.

Safranek V.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Horansky F.

Serve advantage — Horansky F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Horansky F.Safranek V.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 49). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Horansky F.Safranek V.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
29
20
Break points saved·Clear edge
34
55
Break points won·Clear edge
33
14
Deciding sets·Slight edge
54
49
Tiebreaks·Dominant
64
16

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Laaksonen H.[4]
Moroni G.[17]
6-727-626-2
Semi-finals
Laaksonen H.[4]
Lorenzi P.[2]
7-656-756-1
Moroni G.[17]
Pavlasek A.[14]
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Moroni G.[17]
Horansky F.[9]
6-41-0
Lorenzi P.[2]
Napolitano S.[10]
6-36-2
Laaksonen H.[4]
Caruso S.[8]
6-46-4
Pavlasek A.[14]
Majchrzak K.[5]
6-37-62
R16
Moroni G.[17]
Valkusz M.
6-5
Lorenzi P.[2]
Gaio F.[13]
6-16-4
Laaksonen H.[4]
Viola M.[16]
6-46-3
Caruso S.[8]
Galovic V.[12]
6-36-4
Horansky F.[9]
Otte O.[7]
6-47-65
Pavlasek A.[14]
Bonadio R.
6-36-1
Napolitano S.[10]
Kovalik J.[6]
7-633-67-5
Majchrzak K.[5]
Marcora R.[11]
6-37-62
R32
Bonadio R.
Marterer M.[1]
1-66-30-0
Marcora R.[11]
Casanova H.
6-21-66-2
Horansky F.[9]
Safranek V.
6-34-66-3
Majchrzak K.[5]
Kivattsev K.
6-37-66
Lorenzi P.[2]
Sakamoto P.
6-22-66-1
Gaio F.[13]
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-46-4
Napolitano S.[10]
Haerteis J.
6-26-3
Kovalik J.[6]
Iannaccone F.
6-06-2
Laaksonen H.[4]
Heller P.
6-26-1
Viola M.[16]
Olivo R.
6-37-5
Galovic V.[12]
Collarini A.
3-66-46-4
Otte O.[7]
Ficovich J.
7-636-2
Valkusz M.
Balazs A.[15]
6-46-3
Moroni G.[17]
Blanch U.
6-26-3
Pavlasek A.[14]
Brkic T.
3-66-36-2
Caruso S.[8]
Bega A.
6-46-1
R64
Olivo R.
Wang T.
7-664-1
Bega A.
Torebko P.
4-67-51-0
Kivattsev K.
Maggioli E.
6-26-3
Boluda Purkiss C.
Ornago F.
6-746-46-1
Haerteis J.
Mansouri S.
7-636-767-5
Iannaccone F.
Molcan A.
6-746-36-4
Heller P.
Jacq G.
6-36-3
Collarini A.
Pavic A.
6-46-4
Safranek V.
Margaroli L.
2-66-36-4
Valkusz M.
Ocleppo J.
6-26-2
Blanch U.
Nagal S.
6-27-5
Casanova H.
Petrovic D.
6-44-66-2
Brkic T.
Turchetti N.
6-26-2
Bonadio R.
Passaro F.
6-36-3
Sakamoto P.
Dima D.
6-27-5
Ficovich J.
Klein B.
6-26-2