Riccardo Bonadio vs Francesco Passaro — Rome CH Round of 64

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
ITA
Riccardo Bonadio
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 May 2019
clay
Francesco Passaro
ITA
Francesco Passaro
#182ATP
1592ELO
1578Clay ELO
$88kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLL
Bonadio R.
6-3 6-3
Passaro F.
Bonadio R.
662
Passaro F.
330

Riccardo Bonadio defeated Francesco Passaro 6-3 6-3 in the Rome CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bonadio R.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Passaro F.

Passaro F.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Bonadio R.

Serve advantage — Passaro F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bonadio R.Passaro F.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bonadio R.Passaro F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
58
Break points saved·Clear edge
70
89
Break points won·Slight edge
19
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
44
82
Tiebreaks·Dominant
17
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Bonadio R.Passaro F.
Freshness·
—
60

Passaro F.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 91 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Laaksonen H.[4]
Moroni G.[17]
6-727-626-2
Semi-finals
Laaksonen H.[4]
Lorenzi P.[2]
7-656-756-1
Moroni G.[17]
Pavlasek A.[14]
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Moroni G.[17]
Horansky F.[9]
6-41-0
Lorenzi P.[2]
Napolitano S.[10]
6-36-2
Laaksonen H.[4]
Caruso S.[8]
6-46-4
Pavlasek A.[14]
Majchrzak K.[5]
6-37-62
R16
Moroni G.[17]
Valkusz M.
6-5
Lorenzi P.[2]
Gaio F.[13]
6-16-4
Laaksonen H.[4]
Viola M.[16]
6-46-3
Caruso S.[8]
Galovic V.[12]
6-36-4
Horansky F.[9]
Otte O.[7]
6-47-65
Pavlasek A.[14]
Bonadio R.
6-36-1
Napolitano S.[10]
Kovalik J.[6]
7-633-67-5
Majchrzak K.[5]
Marcora R.[11]
6-37-62
R32
Bonadio R.
Marterer M.[1]
1-66-30-0
Marcora R.[11]
Casanova H.
6-21-66-2
Horansky F.[9]
Safranek V.
6-34-66-3
Majchrzak K.[5]
Kivattsev K.
6-37-66
Lorenzi P.[2]
Sakamoto P.
6-22-66-1
Gaio F.[13]
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-46-4
Napolitano S.[10]
Haerteis J.
6-26-3
Kovalik J.[6]
Iannaccone F.
6-06-2
Laaksonen H.[4]
Heller P.
6-26-1
Viola M.[16]
Olivo R.
6-37-5
Galovic V.[12]
Collarini A.
3-66-46-4
Otte O.[7]
Ficovich J.
7-636-2
Valkusz M.
Balazs A.[15]
6-46-3
Moroni G.[17]
Blanch U.
6-26-3
Pavlasek A.[14]
Brkic T.
3-66-36-2
Caruso S.[8]
Bega A.
6-46-1
R64
Olivo R.
Wang T.
7-664-1
Bega A.
Torebko P.
4-67-51-0
Kivattsev K.
Maggioli E.
6-26-3
Boluda Purkiss C.
Ornago F.
6-746-46-1
Haerteis J.
Mansouri S.
7-636-767-5
Iannaccone F.
Molcan A.
6-746-36-4
Heller P.
Jacq G.
6-36-3
Collarini A.
Pavic A.
6-46-4
Safranek V.
Margaroli L.
2-66-36-4
Valkusz M.
Ocleppo J.
6-26-2
Blanch U.
Nagal S.
6-27-5
Casanova H.
Petrovic D.
6-44-66-2
Brkic T.
Turchetti N.
6-26-2
Bonadio R.
Passaro F.
6-36-3
Sakamoto P.
Dima D.
6-27-5
Ficovich J.
Klein B.
6-26-2