Max Purcell vs Nikola Milojevic — Seoul CH Semi-final

Seoul CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
AUS
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 April 2019
hard
SRB13
Nikola Milojevic
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Purcell M.
6-2 6-0
Milojevic N.
Purcell M.
662
Milojevic N.
200

Max Purcell defeated Nikola Milojevic 6-2 6-0 in the Seoul CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Nikola Milojevic came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Max Purcell claimed a first win over Nikola Milojevic in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-08-26US OpenQ1hardNikola Milojevic6-3 6-7(3) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Milojevic N.

Milojevic N.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Milojevic N.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.6
3.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Purcell M.Milojevic N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
10
Break points saved·Dominant
92
30
Break points won·Clear edge
10
27
Deciding sets·Dominant
84
11
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
81
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kwon S.[11]
Purcell M.
7-57-5
Semi-finals
Purcell M.
Milojevic N.[13]
6-26-0
Kwon S.[11]
Wu T.
7-646-3
Quarter-finals
Purcell M.
Ito T.[12]
6-767-626-3
Milojevic N.[13]
Li Z.
6-47-5
Wu T.
Bolt A.[9]
7-56-4
Kwon S.[11]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-767-5
R16
Bolt A.[9]
Santillan A.
7-646-3
Wu T.
Myneni S.
6-47-5
Ito T.[12]
Lacko L.[5]
6-46-1
Li Z.
Ramanathan R.[10]
6-46-757-66
Kwon S.[11]
Donskoy E.[8]
7-626-3
Uchiyama Y.
Chung Y.
6-46-4
Purcell M.
Berankis R.[2]
4-66-46-3
Milojevic N.[13]
Stakhovsky S.[3]
6-27-65
R32
Purcell M.
Bemelmans R.[14]
6-27-64
Li Z.
Baghdatis M.[7]
6-46-2
Bolt A.[9]
Yang T.
7-656-736-3
Donskoy E.[8]
Bai Y.
4-66-36-3
Uchiyama Y.
Balaji N.
6-756-36-4
Lacko L.[5]
Saville L.
6-36-4
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Noguchi R.
6-16-4
Milojevic N.[13]
Lee J.
6-716-36-3
Myneni S.
Moriya H.[15]
6-26-1
Wu T.
Schnur B.[4]
6-16-766-2
Chung Y.
Sugita Y.[16]
6-26-3
Berankis R.[2]
Setkic A.
6-43-66-4
Ito T.[12]
Peliwo F.
7-56-2
Ramanathan R.[10]
Nam J.
6-37-66
Santillan A.
Jung J.[6]
6-35-77-63
Kwon S.[11]
Imai S.
6-36-2
R64
Lee J.
Kim D.
6-26-2
Santillan A.
Hossam Y.
Def.
Chung Y.
Robert S.
1-66-26-4
Purcell M.
Banes M.
7-646-3
Wu T.
Uchida K.
4-66-16-4
Setkic A.
Oliveira G.
7-57-64
Bai Y.
Grills J.
6-46-1
Saville L.
Mukund S.
6-26-4
Noguchi R.
Hong S.
3-66-46-0
Nam J.
Lee D.
7-56-1
Li Z.
Echargui M.
6-26-4
Yang T.
Soeda G.
2-66-46-4
Myneni S.
Xia Z.
6-46-1
Imai S.
Chung H.
6-16-3
Peliwo F.
Sin S.
6-26-0
Uchiyama Y.
Ilkel C.
6-31-66-3