Paolo Lorenzi vs Sumit Nagal — Savannah CH Semi-final

Savannah CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
ITA2
Paolo Lorenzi
44 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 April 2019
clay
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
Lorenzi P.
6-4 4-6 6-2
Nagal S.
Lorenzi P.
6462
Nagal S.
4621

Paolo Lorenzi defeated Sumit Nagal 6-4 4-6 6-2 in the Savannah CH semi-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Paolo Lorenzi closed it out in three sets, 6–4 4–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lorenzi P.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Lorenzi P.

Serve advantage — Nagal S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lorenzi P.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
42%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.7
1.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (125 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lorenzi P.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
44
33
Break points saved·Clear edge
84
69
Break points won·Clear edge
21
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
67
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
34
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Lorenzi P.Nagal S.
Freshness·
—
96

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Coria F.[15]
Lorenzi P.[2]
6-34-66-2
Semi-finals
Lorenzi P.[2]
Nagal S.
6-44-66-2
Coria F.[15]
Vukic A.
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Vukic A.
Paul T.[5]
W/O
Lorenzi P.[2]
Eubanks C.[6]
6-36-3
Nagal S.
Moutet C.[3]
6-47-5
Coria F.[15]
Muller A.
6-46-1
R16
Vukic A.
Altamirano C.
7-630-0
Nagal S.
Korda S.
6-37-60
Paul T.[5]
Gonzalez A.
4-67-627-5
Muller A.
Blanch U.
2-66-36-1
Lorenzi P.[2]
Cid R.[16]
6-42-67-5
Eubanks C.[6]
Barrios Vera T.
6-26-3
Moutet C.[3]
Kwiatkowski T.[14]
6-46-2
Coria F.[15]
Sandgren T.[1]
6-27-65
R32
Coria F.[15]
Rinderknech A.
6-27-5
Nagal S.
Moraing M.[8]
6-14-2
Lorenzi P.[2]
Ly N.
6-36-2
Muller A.
Aragone J.[11]
7-647-64
Paul T.[5]
Ehrat S.
5-76-36-4
Cid R.[16]
Guinard M.
6-46-4
Moutet C.[3]
Kingsley C.
6-16-1
Kwiatkowski T.[14]
Collarini A.
6-37-5
Gonzalez A.
Gomez E.[12]
6-06-3
Altamirano C.
Rubin N.[4]
2-66-26-2
Blanch U.
Polmans M.[7]
6-36-3
Sandgren T.[1]
Ritschard A.
6-23-66-3
Korda S.
Torpegaard M.[9]
6-36-3
Vukic A.
Clezar G.[13]
7-626-766-3
Barrios Vera T.
Serdarusic N.[10]
1-66-36-1
Eubanks C.[6]
Yevseyev D.
6-36-4
R64
Blanch U.
Kelly D.
4-1
Nagal S.
Varillas J.
6-736-27-5
Gonzalez A.
Arconada J.
6-46-2
Ritschard A.
Klein B.
6-13-1
Altamirano C.
Avidzba A.
6-07-61
Ly N.
Rodriguez R.
6-26-2
Ehrat S.
Cuevas M.
6-06-0
Muller A.
Hassan B.
6-15-77-66
Barrios Vera T.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-46-0
Guinard M.
Novikov D.
6-34-66-4
Kingsley C.
Haerteis J.
6-26-2
Collarini A.
Zhu E.
7-56-4
Rinderknech A.
Shane R.
6-16-4
Korda S.
Hiltzik J.
6-46-0
Yevseyev D.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-42-66-1
Vukic A.
Kozlov S.
6-27-611