Sumit Nagal vs Sebastian Korda — Savannah CH Round of 16

Savannah CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 April 2019
clay
Sebastian Korda
USA
Sebastian Korda
#63ATP
1809ELO
1670Clay ELO
$471kYTD
$9.0MCAREER
26 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWWW
Nagal S.
6-3 7-6
Korda S.
Nagal S.
6772
Korda S.
3600

Sumit Nagal defeated Sebastian Korda 6-3 7-6 in the Savannah CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Sebastian Korda came in ranked #63.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Korda S.

Korda S.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Korda S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.4
8.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Korda S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
33
87
Break points saved·Dominant
69
98
Break points won·Dominant
35
73
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
96
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
84
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Korda S.
Freshness·
96
—

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Coria F.[15]
Lorenzi P.[2]
6-34-66-2
Semi-finals
Lorenzi P.[2]
Nagal S.
6-44-66-2
Coria F.[15]
Vukic A.
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Vukic A.
Paul T.[5]
W/O
Lorenzi P.[2]
Eubanks C.[6]
6-36-3
Nagal S.
Moutet C.[3]
6-47-5
Coria F.[15]
Muller A.
6-46-1
R16
Vukic A.
Altamirano C.
7-630-0
Nagal S.
Korda S.
6-37-60
Paul T.[5]
Gonzalez A.
4-67-627-5
Muller A.
Blanch U.
2-66-36-1
Lorenzi P.[2]
Cid R.[16]
6-42-67-5
Eubanks C.[6]
Barrios Vera T.
6-26-3
Moutet C.[3]
Kwiatkowski T.[14]
6-46-2
Coria F.[15]
Sandgren T.[1]
6-27-65
R32
Coria F.[15]
Rinderknech A.
6-27-5
Nagal S.
Moraing M.[8]
6-14-2
Lorenzi P.[2]
Ly N.
6-36-2
Muller A.
Aragone J.[11]
7-647-64
Paul T.[5]
Ehrat S.
5-76-36-4
Cid R.[16]
Guinard M.
6-46-4
Moutet C.[3]
Kingsley C.
6-16-1
Kwiatkowski T.[14]
Collarini A.
6-37-5
Gonzalez A.
Gomez E.[12]
6-06-3
Altamirano C.
Rubin N.[4]
2-66-26-2
Blanch U.
Polmans M.[7]
6-36-3
Sandgren T.[1]
Ritschard A.
6-23-66-3
Korda S.
Torpegaard M.[9]
6-36-3
Vukic A.
Clezar G.[13]
7-626-766-3
Barrios Vera T.
Serdarusic N.[10]
1-66-36-1
Eubanks C.[6]
Yevseyev D.
6-36-4
R64
Blanch U.
Kelly D.
4-1
Nagal S.
Varillas J.
6-736-27-5
Gonzalez A.
Arconada J.
6-46-2
Ritschard A.
Klein B.
6-13-1
Altamirano C.
Avidzba A.
6-07-61
Ly N.
Rodriguez R.
6-26-2
Ehrat S.
Cuevas M.
6-06-0
Muller A.
Hassan B.
6-15-77-66
Barrios Vera T.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-46-0
Guinard M.
Novikov D.
6-34-66-4
Kingsley C.
Haerteis J.
6-26-2
Collarini A.
Zhu E.
7-56-4
Rinderknech A.
Shane R.
6-16-4
Korda S.
Hiltzik J.
6-46-0
Yevseyev D.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-42-66-1
Vukic A.
Kozlov S.
6-27-611