Rio Noguchi vs Seong Chan Hong — Seoul CH Round of 64

Seoul CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Rio Noguchi
JPN
Rio Noguchi
#222ATP
1532ELO
1513Hard ELO
27 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 April 2019
hard
KOR
Seong Chan Hong
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLWL
Noguchi R.
3-6 6-4 6-0
Hong S.
Noguchi R.
3662
Hong S.
6401

Rio Noguchi defeated Seong Chan Hong 3-6 6-4 6-0 in the Seoul CH round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Seong Chan Hong came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Noguchi R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Hong S.

Hong S.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Noguchi R.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Noguchi R.Hong S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.8
4.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.6
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 147). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Noguchi R.Hong S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
23
52
Break points saved·Dominant
25
77
Break points won·Even
26
30
Deciding sets·Clear edge
82
65
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Noguchi R.Hong S.
Freshness·
68
—

Noguchi R.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 60 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kwon S.[11]
Purcell M.
7-57-5
Semi-finals
Purcell M.
Milojevic N.[13]
6-26-0
Kwon S.[11]
Wu T.
7-646-3
Quarter-finals
Purcell M.
Ito T.[12]
6-767-626-3
Milojevic N.[13]
Li Z.
6-47-5
Wu T.
Bolt A.[9]
7-56-4
Kwon S.[11]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-767-5
R16
Bolt A.[9]
Santillan A.
7-646-3
Wu T.
Myneni S.
6-47-5
Ito T.[12]
Lacko L.[5]
6-46-1
Li Z.
Ramanathan R.[10]
6-46-757-66
Kwon S.[11]
Donskoy E.[8]
7-626-3
Uchiyama Y.
Chung Y.
6-46-4
Purcell M.
Berankis R.[2]
4-66-46-3
Milojevic N.[13]
Stakhovsky S.[3]
6-27-65
R32
Purcell M.
Bemelmans R.[14]
6-27-64
Li Z.
Baghdatis M.[7]
6-46-2
Bolt A.[9]
Yang T.
7-656-736-3
Donskoy E.[8]
Bai Y.
4-66-36-3
Uchiyama Y.
Balaji N.
6-756-36-4
Lacko L.[5]
Saville L.
6-36-4
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Noguchi R.
6-16-4
Milojevic N.[13]
Lee J.
6-716-36-3
Myneni S.
Moriya H.[15]
6-26-1
Wu T.
Schnur B.[4]
6-16-766-2
Chung Y.
Sugita Y.[16]
6-26-3
Berankis R.[2]
Setkic A.
6-43-66-4
Ito T.[12]
Peliwo F.
7-56-2
Ramanathan R.[10]
Nam J.
6-37-66
Santillan A.
Jung J.[6]
6-35-77-63
Kwon S.[11]
Imai S.
6-36-2
R64
Lee J.
Kim D.
6-26-2
Santillan A.
Hossam Y.
Def.
Chung Y.
Robert S.
1-66-26-4
Purcell M.
Banes M.
7-646-3
Wu T.
Uchida K.
4-66-16-4
Setkic A.
Oliveira G.
7-57-64
Bai Y.
Grills J.
6-46-1
Saville L.
Mukund S.
6-26-4
Noguchi R.
Hong S.
3-66-46-0
Nam J.
Lee D.
7-56-1
Li Z.
Echargui M.
6-26-4
Yang T.
Soeda G.
2-66-46-4
Myneni S.
Xia Z.
6-46-1
Imai S.
Chung H.
6-16-3
Peliwo F.
Sin S.
6-26-0
Uchiyama Y.
Ilkel C.
6-31-66-3