Zhe Li vs Moez Echargui — Seoul CH Round of 64

Seoul CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
CHN
Zhe Li
#1964ATP
39 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 April 2019
hard
Moez Echargui
TUN
Moez Echargui
#151ATP
1416ELO
1408Hard ELO
$171kYTD
$469kCAREER
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Li Z.
6-2 6-4
Echargui M.
Li Z.
662
Echargui M.
240

Zhe Li defeated Moez Echargui 6-2 6-4 in the Seoul CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Li Z.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Echargui M.

Echargui M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Li Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Li Z.Echargui M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.7
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (102 vs 195). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Li Z.Echargui M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
23
4
Break points saved·Slight edge
58
48
Break points won·Slight edge
18
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
44
4
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
31
42

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Li Z.Echargui M.
Freshness·
—
100

Echargui M.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kwon S.[11]
Purcell M.
7-57-5
Semi-finals
Purcell M.
Milojevic N.[13]
6-26-0
Kwon S.[11]
Wu T.
7-646-3
Quarter-finals
Purcell M.
Ito T.[12]
6-767-626-3
Milojevic N.[13]
Li Z.
6-47-5
Wu T.
Bolt A.[9]
7-56-4
Kwon S.[11]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-767-5
R16
Bolt A.[9]
Santillan A.
7-646-3
Wu T.
Myneni S.
6-47-5
Ito T.[12]
Lacko L.[5]
6-46-1
Li Z.
Ramanathan R.[10]
6-46-757-66
Kwon S.[11]
Donskoy E.[8]
7-626-3
Uchiyama Y.
Chung Y.
6-46-4
Purcell M.
Berankis R.[2]
4-66-46-3
Milojevic N.[13]
Stakhovsky S.[3]
6-27-65
R32
Purcell M.
Bemelmans R.[14]
6-27-64
Li Z.
Baghdatis M.[7]
6-46-2
Bolt A.[9]
Yang T.
7-656-736-3
Donskoy E.[8]
Bai Y.
4-66-36-3
Uchiyama Y.
Balaji N.
6-756-36-4
Lacko L.[5]
Saville L.
6-36-4
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Noguchi R.
6-16-4
Milojevic N.[13]
Lee J.
6-716-36-3
Myneni S.
Moriya H.[15]
6-26-1
Wu T.
Schnur B.[4]
6-16-766-2
Chung Y.
Sugita Y.[16]
6-26-3
Berankis R.[2]
Setkic A.
6-43-66-4
Ito T.[12]
Peliwo F.
7-56-2
Ramanathan R.[10]
Nam J.
6-37-66
Santillan A.
Jung J.[6]
6-35-77-63
Kwon S.[11]
Imai S.
6-36-2
R64
Lee J.
Kim D.
6-26-2
Santillan A.
Hossam Y.
Def.
Chung Y.
Robert S.
1-66-26-4
Purcell M.
Banes M.
7-646-3
Wu T.
Uchida K.
4-66-16-4
Setkic A.
Oliveira G.
7-57-64
Bai Y.
Grills J.
6-46-1
Saville L.
Mukund S.
6-26-4
Noguchi R.
Hong S.
3-66-46-0
Nam J.
Lee D.
7-56-1
Li Z.
Echargui M.
6-26-4
Yang T.
Soeda G.
2-66-46-4
Myneni S.
Xia Z.
6-46-1
Imai S.
Chung H.
6-16-3
Peliwo F.
Sin S.
6-26-0
Uchiyama Y.
Ilkel C.
6-31-66-3