Max Purcell vs Ricardas Berankis — Seoul CH Round of 16

Seoul CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 April 2019
hard
LTU2
Ricardas Berankis
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
Purcell M.
4-6 6-4 6-3
Berankis R.
Purcell M.
4662
Berankis R.
6431

Max Purcell defeated Ricardas Berankis 4-6 6-4 6-3 in the Seoul CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Ricardas Berankis came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Max Purcell claimed a first win over Ricardas Berankis in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-01-14Australian OpenQ1hardRicardas Berankis6-1 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Berankis R.

Berankis R.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Berankis R.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.6
3.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Purcell M.Berankis R.
Clutch Rating·Even
59
58
Break points saved·Even
92
91
Break points won·Slight edge
10
16
Deciding sets·Even
84
80
Tiebreaks·Even
81
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kwon S.[11]
Purcell M.
7-57-5
Semi-finals
Purcell M.
Milojevic N.[13]
6-26-0
Kwon S.[11]
Wu T.
7-646-3
Quarter-finals
Purcell M.
Ito T.[12]
6-767-626-3
Milojevic N.[13]
Li Z.
6-47-5
Wu T.
Bolt A.[9]
7-56-4
Kwon S.[11]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-767-5
R16
Bolt A.[9]
Santillan A.
7-646-3
Wu T.
Myneni S.
6-47-5
Ito T.[12]
Lacko L.[5]
6-46-1
Li Z.
Ramanathan R.[10]
6-46-757-66
Kwon S.[11]
Donskoy E.[8]
7-626-3
Uchiyama Y.
Chung Y.
6-46-4
Purcell M.
Berankis R.[2]
4-66-46-3
Milojevic N.[13]
Stakhovsky S.[3]
6-27-65
R32
Purcell M.
Bemelmans R.[14]
6-27-64
Li Z.
Baghdatis M.[7]
6-46-2
Bolt A.[9]
Yang T.
7-656-736-3
Donskoy E.[8]
Bai Y.
4-66-36-3
Uchiyama Y.
Balaji N.
6-756-36-4
Lacko L.[5]
Saville L.
6-36-4
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Noguchi R.
6-16-4
Milojevic N.[13]
Lee J.
6-716-36-3
Myneni S.
Moriya H.[15]
6-26-1
Wu T.
Schnur B.[4]
6-16-766-2
Chung Y.
Sugita Y.[16]
6-26-3
Berankis R.[2]
Setkic A.
6-43-66-4
Ito T.[12]
Peliwo F.
7-56-2
Ramanathan R.[10]
Nam J.
6-37-66
Santillan A.
Jung J.[6]
6-35-77-63
Kwon S.[11]
Imai S.
6-36-2
R64
Lee J.
Kim D.
6-26-2
Santillan A.
Hossam Y.
Def.
Chung Y.
Robert S.
1-66-26-4
Purcell M.
Banes M.
7-646-3
Wu T.
Uchida K.
4-66-16-4
Setkic A.
Oliveira G.
7-57-64
Bai Y.
Grills J.
6-46-1
Saville L.
Mukund S.
6-26-4
Noguchi R.
Hong S.
3-66-46-0
Nam J.
Lee D.
7-56-1
Li Z.
Echargui M.
6-26-4
Yang T.
Soeda G.
2-66-46-4
Myneni S.
Xia Z.
6-46-1
Imai S.
Chung H.
6-16-3
Peliwo F.
Sin S.
6-26-0
Uchiyama Y.
Ilkel C.
6-31-66-3