Max Purcell vs Maverick Banes — Seoul CH Round of 64

Seoul CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
AUS
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 April 2019
hard
AUS
Maverick Banes
34 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLW
Purcell M.
7-6 6-3
Banes M.
Purcell M.
7762
Banes M.
6430

Max Purcell defeated Maverick Banes 7-6 6-3 in the Seoul CH round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Maverick Banes came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Max Purcell closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Banes M.

Banes M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Serve advantage — Purcell M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Banes M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.6
3.7
Double faults / match·Even
1.9
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 40). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Purcell M.Banes M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
16
Break points saved·Dominant
92
41
Break points won·Dominant
10
42
Deciding sets·Dominant
84
18
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kwon S.[11]
Purcell M.
7-57-5
Semi-finals
Purcell M.
Milojevic N.[13]
6-26-0
Kwon S.[11]
Wu T.
7-646-3
Quarter-finals
Purcell M.
Ito T.[12]
6-767-626-3
Milojevic N.[13]
Li Z.
6-47-5
Wu T.
Bolt A.[9]
7-56-4
Kwon S.[11]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-767-5
R16
Bolt A.[9]
Santillan A.
7-646-3
Wu T.
Myneni S.
6-47-5
Ito T.[12]
Lacko L.[5]
6-46-1
Li Z.
Ramanathan R.[10]
6-46-757-66
Kwon S.[11]
Donskoy E.[8]
7-626-3
Uchiyama Y.
Chung Y.
6-46-4
Purcell M.
Berankis R.[2]
4-66-46-3
Milojevic N.[13]
Stakhovsky S.[3]
6-27-65
R32
Purcell M.
Bemelmans R.[14]
6-27-64
Li Z.
Baghdatis M.[7]
6-46-2
Bolt A.[9]
Yang T.
7-656-736-3
Donskoy E.[8]
Bai Y.
4-66-36-3
Uchiyama Y.
Balaji N.
6-756-36-4
Lacko L.[5]
Saville L.
6-36-4
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Noguchi R.
6-16-4
Milojevic N.[13]
Lee J.
6-716-36-3
Myneni S.
Moriya H.[15]
6-26-1
Wu T.
Schnur B.[4]
6-16-766-2
Chung Y.
Sugita Y.[16]
6-26-3
Berankis R.[2]
Setkic A.
6-43-66-4
Ito T.[12]
Peliwo F.
7-56-2
Ramanathan R.[10]
Nam J.
6-37-66
Santillan A.
Jung J.[6]
6-35-77-63
Kwon S.[11]
Imai S.
6-36-2
R64
Lee J.
Kim D.
6-26-2
Santillan A.
Hossam Y.
Def.
Chung Y.
Robert S.
1-66-26-4
Purcell M.
Banes M.
7-646-3
Wu T.
Uchida K.
4-66-16-4
Setkic A.
Oliveira G.
7-57-64
Bai Y.
Grills J.
6-46-1
Saville L.
Mukund S.
6-26-4
Noguchi R.
Hong S.
3-66-46-0
Nam J.
Lee D.
7-56-1
Li Z.
Echargui M.
6-26-4
Yang T.
Soeda G.
2-66-46-4
Myneni S.
Xia Z.
6-46-1
Imai S.
Chung H.
6-16-3
Peliwo F.
Sin S.
6-26-0
Uchiyama Y.
Ilkel C.
6-31-66-3