Mikael Ymer vs Matteo Viola — Francavilla Al Mare CH Round of 32

Francavilla Al Mare CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SWE8
Mikael Ymer
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 April 2019
clay
ITA
Matteo Viola
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLL
Ymer M.
6-1 6-2
Viola M.
Ymer M.
662
Viola M.
120

Mikael Ymer defeated Matteo Viola 6-1 6-2 in the Francavilla Al Mare CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Mikael Ymer came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Mikael Ymer extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-05-24ParmaQ2clayMikael Ymer6-4 3-6 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Ymer M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Viola M.

Viola M.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Ymer M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ymer M.Viola M.
1st serve in·Even
67%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Even
60%
57%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.5
1.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 151). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ymer M.Viola M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
8
Break points saved·Dominant
90
20
Break points won·Dominant
71
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
15
Tiebreaks·Dominant
29
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Travaglia S.[5]
Otte O.[3]
6-36-736-3
Semi-finals
Otte O.[3]
Marterer M.[1]
6-14-1
Travaglia S.[5]
Gombos N.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Travaglia S.[5]
Gaio F.
6-746-47-66
Gombos N.
Brkic T.
6-46-1
Marterer M.[1]
Ymer M.[8]
6-46-4
Otte O.[3]
Molleker R.[7]
6-46-4
R16
Marterer M.[1]
Vatutin A.
2-66-36-1
Otte O.[3]
Bellucci T.
4-3
Travaglia S.[5]
Zeppieri G.
6-22-0
Ymer M.[8]
Kotov P.
0-67-57-5
Brkic T.
Musetti L.
7-56-3
Gombos N.
Coppejans K.[10]
6-47-5
Molleker R.[7]
Moroni G.
3-66-26-0
Gaio F.
Hernandez J.
7-640-66-1
R32
Musetti L.
Donati M.[15]
6-40-0
Molleker R.[7]
Ocleppo J.
6-43-66-4
Moroni G.
Del Federico A.
6-16-2
Coppejans K.[10]
Bonadio R.
4-67-647-5
Marterer M.[1]
Elias G.
6-746-36-3
Brkic T.
Quinzi G.[2]
6-36-0
Gaio F.
Caruso S.[4]
6-17-5
Hernandez J.
Rodionov J.[13]
7-676-2
Travaglia S.[5]
Pellegrino A.
7-656-3
Bellucci T.
Arguello F.[16]
7-646-2
Ymer M.[8]
Viola M.
6-16-2
Vatutin A.
Galovic V.[14]
4-66-36-3
Gombos N.
Halys Q.[6]
6-26-2
Zeppieri G.
Koepfer D.[11]
6-44-66-3
Otte O.[3]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-16-4
Kotov P.
Griekspoor T.[12]
6-756-46-4
R64
Bellucci T.
Setkic A.
6-16-2
Brkic T.
Brancaccio R.
2-66-16-2
Musetti L.
Di Nicola G.
6-33-66-4
Bonadio R.
Berrettini J.
7-53-66-3
Gombos N.
Darcis S.
4-66-26-3
Hernandez J.
Basso A.
7-54-66-3
Zeppieri G.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-16-3
Ocleppo J.
Tatlot J.
6-33-66-2
Moroni G.
Nedelko I.
6-36-2
Zapata Miralles B.
Escoffier A.
6-26-3
Viola M.
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-36-2
Kotov P.
Sakharov G.
6-46-2
Vatutin A.
Ly N.
6-16-4
Elias G.
Perez Sanz D.
6-47-64
Gaio F.
Couacaud E.
7-664-66-0
Pellegrino A.
Vavassori A.
3-66-16-2