Tennys Sandgren vs Noah Rubin — Tallahassee CH Quarter-final

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA2
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 April 2019
clay
USA5
Noah Rubin
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
Sandgren T.
7-5 6-1
Rubin N.
Sandgren T.
762
Rubin N.
510

Tennys Sandgren defeated Noah Rubin 7-5 6-1 in the Tallahassee CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Noah Rubin came in defending the title.

Key context

  • Match story: Tennys Sandgren came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sandgren T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Rubin N.

Rubin N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sandgren T.Rubin N.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.5
4.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 89). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sandgren T.Rubin N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
49
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
80
Break points won·Dominant
2
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
54
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
86
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Gomez E.
Paul T.[9]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Gomez E.
Moutet C.[3]
6-16-4
Paul T.[9]
Sandgren T.[2]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Paul T.[9]
Torpegaard M.[13]
6-46-1
Moutet C.[3]
Nagal S.
6-21-67-5
Gomez E.
Serdarusic N.[16]
6-756-36-0
Sandgren T.[2]
Rubin N.[5]
7-56-1
R16
Moutet C.[3]
Tabilo A.
2-67-56-2
Gomez E.
Polmans M.[6]
6-46-2
Rubin N.[5]
Karlovskiy E.[12]
3-66-47-5
Sandgren T.[2]
Ehrat S.
6-36-756-4
Torpegaard M.[13]
Coria F.
6-35-76-3
Paul T.[9]
Krueger M.[7]
2-66-47-62
Serdarusic N.[16]
Collarini A.
3-66-26-3
Nagal S.
Arconada J.
7-646-1
R32
Nagal S.
Giraldo S.[10]
6-24-3
Moutet C.[3]
Gonzalez A.
6-24-2
Polmans M.[6]
Korda S.
7-636-736-4
Gomez E.
Moraing M.[11]
7-56-1
Serdarusic N.[16]
Altamirano C.
6-32-67-65
Karlovskiy E.[12]
Barrios Vera T.
6-31-66-3
Sandgren T.[2]
Kozlov S.
6-36-2
Rubin N.[5]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-2
Torpegaard M.[13]
Muller A.
6-23-66-4
Arconada J.
Ritschard A.
4-67-56-1
Collarini A.
Lorenzi P.[1]
6-26-746-4
Tabilo A.
Aragone J.[15]
6-36-2
Ehrat S.
Clezar G.[14]
6-777-56-2
Krueger M.[7]
Haerteis J.
3-66-46-1
Paul T.[9]
Cuevas M.
6-16-4
Coria F.
Polansky P.[4]
6-36-2
R64
Gomez E.
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Cuevas M.
Khan Z.
6-32-0
Ehrat S.
Karatsev A.
7-652-66-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Hassan B.
6-36-3
Nagal S.
Yevseyev D.
6-07-67
Barrios Vera T.
Rinderknech A.
7-636-3
Coria F.
Sels J.
6-16-2
Kozlov S.
Zhurbin A.
4-66-46-0
Muller A.
Blanch U.
7-616-3
Haerteis J.
Song E.
6-46-4
Altamirano C.
Shane R.
6-47-64
Gonzalez A.
Millot V.
6-26-3
Ritschard A.
Cid R.
6-43-66-4
Tabilo A.
Varillas J.
6-17-66
Korda S.
Zekic M.
6-46-2
Collarini A.
Bangoura S.
6-33-66-2