Sumit Nagal vs Denis Yevseyev — Tallahassee CH Round of 64

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 April 2019
clay
Denis Yevseyev
KAZ
Denis Yevseyev
#445ATP
1375ELO
1341Clay ELO
33 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLWW
Nagal S.
6-0 7-6
Yevseyev D.
Nagal S.
6792
Yevseyev D.
0670

Sumit Nagal defeated Denis Yevseyev 6-0 7-6 in the Tallahassee CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Yevseyev D.

Yevseyev D.serving56% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Yevseyev D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
58%
Return points won·Even
42%
41%
Break points saved·Even
58%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.4
2.8
Double faults / match·Even
1.8
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Yevseyev D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
33
0
Break points saved·Dominant
69
15
Break points won·Clear edge
35
21
Deciding sets·Even
16
12
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Yevseyev D.
Freshness·Dominant
96
68

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Yevseyev D.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 33 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Gomez E.
Paul T.[9]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Gomez E.
Moutet C.[3]
6-16-4
Paul T.[9]
Sandgren T.[2]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Paul T.[9]
Torpegaard M.[13]
6-46-1
Moutet C.[3]
Nagal S.
6-21-67-5
Gomez E.
Serdarusic N.[16]
6-756-36-0
Sandgren T.[2]
Rubin N.[5]
7-56-1
R16
Moutet C.[3]
Tabilo A.
2-67-56-2
Gomez E.
Polmans M.[6]
6-46-2
Rubin N.[5]
Karlovskiy E.[12]
3-66-47-5
Sandgren T.[2]
Ehrat S.
6-36-756-4
Torpegaard M.[13]
Coria F.
6-35-76-3
Paul T.[9]
Krueger M.[7]
2-66-47-62
Serdarusic N.[16]
Collarini A.
3-66-26-3
Nagal S.
Arconada J.
7-646-1
R32
Nagal S.
Giraldo S.[10]
6-24-3
Moutet C.[3]
Gonzalez A.
6-24-2
Polmans M.[6]
Korda S.
7-636-736-4
Gomez E.
Moraing M.[11]
7-56-1
Serdarusic N.[16]
Altamirano C.
6-32-67-65
Karlovskiy E.[12]
Barrios Vera T.
6-31-66-3
Sandgren T.[2]
Kozlov S.
6-36-2
Rubin N.[5]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-2
Torpegaard M.[13]
Muller A.
6-23-66-4
Arconada J.
Ritschard A.
4-67-56-1
Collarini A.
Lorenzi P.[1]
6-26-746-4
Tabilo A.
Aragone J.[15]
6-36-2
Ehrat S.
Clezar G.[14]
6-777-56-2
Krueger M.[7]
Haerteis J.
3-66-46-1
Paul T.[9]
Cuevas M.
6-16-4
Coria F.
Polansky P.[4]
6-36-2
R64
Gomez E.
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Cuevas M.
Khan Z.
6-32-0
Ehrat S.
Karatsev A.
7-652-66-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Hassan B.
6-36-3
Nagal S.
Yevseyev D.
6-07-67
Barrios Vera T.
Rinderknech A.
7-636-3
Coria F.
Sels J.
6-16-2
Kozlov S.
Zhurbin A.
4-66-46-0
Muller A.
Blanch U.
7-616-3
Haerteis J.
Song E.
6-46-4
Altamirano C.
Shane R.
6-47-64
Gonzalez A.
Millot V.
6-26-3
Ritschard A.
Cid R.
6-43-66-4
Tabilo A.
Varillas J.
6-17-66
Korda S.
Zekic M.
6-46-2
Collarini A.
Bangoura S.
6-33-66-2