Corentin Moutet vs Alejandro Tabilo — Tallahassee CH Round of 16

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Corentin Moutet
FRA3
Corentin Moutet
#40ATP
1745ELO
1692Clay ELO
$731kYTD
$6.4MCAREER
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 April 2019
clay
Alejandro Tabilo
CHI
Alejandro Tabilo
#31ATP
1819ELO
1781Clay ELO
$1.1MYTD
$5.8MCAREER
29 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWL
Moutet C.
2-6 7-5 6-2
Tabilo A.
Moutet C.
2762
Tabilo A.
6521

Corentin Moutet defeated Alejandro Tabilo 2-6 7-5 6-2 in the Tallahassee CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Alejandro Tabilo came in ranked #31, leading the head-to-head 2–0. Corentin Moutet claimed a first win over Alejandro Tabilo in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-03-19Miami MastersR64hardAlejandro Tabilo5-7 6-3 7-5
2024-02-26SantiagoSFclayAlejandro Tabilo4-6 6-4 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Moutet C.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Tabilo A.

Tabilo A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Moutet C.

Serve advantage — Tabilo A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Moutet C.Tabilo A.
—
Serve
83
64
Return
33

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Moutet C.Tabilo A.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.7
6.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Moutet C.Tabilo A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
82
74
Break points saved·Even
97
97
Break points won·Clear edge
75
59
Deciding sets·Even
88
91
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
78
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Moutet C.Tabilo A.
Freshness·Even
96
98

Moutet C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Tabilo A.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Gomez E.
Paul T.[9]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Gomez E.
Moutet C.[3]
6-16-4
Paul T.[9]
Sandgren T.[2]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Paul T.[9]
Torpegaard M.[13]
6-46-1
Moutet C.[3]
Nagal S.
6-21-67-5
Gomez E.
Serdarusic N.[16]
6-756-36-0
Sandgren T.[2]
Rubin N.[5]
7-56-1
R16
Moutet C.[3]
Tabilo A.
2-67-56-2
Gomez E.
Polmans M.[6]
6-46-2
Rubin N.[5]
Karlovskiy E.[12]
3-66-47-5
Sandgren T.[2]
Ehrat S.
6-36-756-4
Torpegaard M.[13]
Coria F.
6-35-76-3
Paul T.[9]
Krueger M.[7]
2-66-47-62
Serdarusic N.[16]
Collarini A.
3-66-26-3
Nagal S.
Arconada J.
7-646-1
R32
Nagal S.
Giraldo S.[10]
6-24-3
Moutet C.[3]
Gonzalez A.
6-24-2
Polmans M.[6]
Korda S.
7-636-736-4
Gomez E.
Moraing M.[11]
7-56-1
Serdarusic N.[16]
Altamirano C.
6-32-67-65
Karlovskiy E.[12]
Barrios Vera T.
6-31-66-3
Sandgren T.[2]
Kozlov S.
6-36-2
Rubin N.[5]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-2
Torpegaard M.[13]
Muller A.
6-23-66-4
Arconada J.
Ritschard A.
4-67-56-1
Collarini A.
Lorenzi P.[1]
6-26-746-4
Tabilo A.
Aragone J.[15]
6-36-2
Ehrat S.
Clezar G.[14]
6-777-56-2
Krueger M.[7]
Haerteis J.
3-66-46-1
Paul T.[9]
Cuevas M.
6-16-4
Coria F.
Polansky P.[4]
6-36-2
R64
Gomez E.
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Cuevas M.
Khan Z.
6-32-0
Ehrat S.
Karatsev A.
7-652-66-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Hassan B.
6-36-3
Nagal S.
Yevseyev D.
6-07-67
Barrios Vera T.
Rinderknech A.
7-636-3
Coria F.
Sels J.
6-16-2
Kozlov S.
Zhurbin A.
4-66-46-0
Muller A.
Blanch U.
7-616-3
Haerteis J.
Song E.
6-46-4
Altamirano C.
Shane R.
6-47-64
Gonzalez A.
Millot V.
6-26-3
Ritschard A.
Cid R.
6-43-66-4
Tabilo A.
Varillas J.
6-17-66
Korda S.
Zekic M.
6-46-2
Collarini A.
Bangoura S.
6-33-66-2