Emilio Gomez vs Corentin Moutet — Tallahassee CH Semi-final

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
ECU
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 April 2019
clay
Corentin Moutet
FRA3
Corentin Moutet
#40ATP
1745ELO
1692Clay ELO
$731kYTD
$6.4MCAREER
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
Gomez E.
6-1 6-4
Moutet C.
Gomez E.
662
Moutet C.
140

Emilio Gomez defeated Corentin Moutet 6-1 6-4 in the Tallahassee CH semi-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez E.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Moutet C.

Moutet C.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Gomez E.Moutet C.
—
Serve
—
—
Return
64

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gomez E.Moutet C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez E.Moutet C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
82
Break points saved·Clear edge
77
97
Break points won·Dominant
19
75
Deciding sets·Dominant
23
88
Tiebreaks·Even
79
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gomez E.Moutet C.
Freshness·
—
96

Moutet C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Gomez E.
Paul T.[9]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Gomez E.
Moutet C.[3]
6-16-4
Paul T.[9]
Sandgren T.[2]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Paul T.[9]
Torpegaard M.[13]
6-46-1
Moutet C.[3]
Nagal S.
6-21-67-5
Gomez E.
Serdarusic N.[16]
6-756-36-0
Sandgren T.[2]
Rubin N.[5]
7-56-1
R16
Moutet C.[3]
Tabilo A.
2-67-56-2
Gomez E.
Polmans M.[6]
6-46-2
Rubin N.[5]
Karlovskiy E.[12]
3-66-47-5
Sandgren T.[2]
Ehrat S.
6-36-756-4
Torpegaard M.[13]
Coria F.
6-35-76-3
Paul T.[9]
Krueger M.[7]
2-66-47-62
Serdarusic N.[16]
Collarini A.
3-66-26-3
Nagal S.
Arconada J.
7-646-1
R32
Nagal S.
Giraldo S.[10]
6-24-3
Moutet C.[3]
Gonzalez A.
6-24-2
Polmans M.[6]
Korda S.
7-636-736-4
Gomez E.
Moraing M.[11]
7-56-1
Serdarusic N.[16]
Altamirano C.
6-32-67-65
Karlovskiy E.[12]
Barrios Vera T.
6-31-66-3
Sandgren T.[2]
Kozlov S.
6-36-2
Rubin N.[5]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-2
Torpegaard M.[13]
Muller A.
6-23-66-4
Arconada J.
Ritschard A.
4-67-56-1
Collarini A.
Lorenzi P.[1]
6-26-746-4
Tabilo A.
Aragone J.[15]
6-36-2
Ehrat S.
Clezar G.[14]
6-777-56-2
Krueger M.[7]
Haerteis J.
3-66-46-1
Paul T.[9]
Cuevas M.
6-16-4
Coria F.
Polansky P.[4]
6-36-2
R64
Gomez E.
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Cuevas M.
Khan Z.
6-32-0
Ehrat S.
Karatsev A.
7-652-66-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Hassan B.
6-36-3
Nagal S.
Yevseyev D.
6-07-67
Barrios Vera T.
Rinderknech A.
7-636-3
Coria F.
Sels J.
6-16-2
Kozlov S.
Zhurbin A.
4-66-46-0
Muller A.
Blanch U.
7-616-3
Haerteis J.
Song E.
6-46-4
Altamirano C.
Shane R.
6-47-64
Gonzalez A.
Millot V.
6-26-3
Ritschard A.
Cid R.
6-43-66-4
Tabilo A.
Varillas J.
6-17-66
Korda S.
Zekic M.
6-46-2
Collarini A.
Bangoura S.
6-33-66-2