James Duckworth vs Di Wu — Nanchang CH Round of 32

Nanchang CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
James Duckworth
AUS5
James Duckworth
#74ATP
1628ELO
1573Clay ELO
$485kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 April 2019
clay
CHN
Di Wu
34 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWLLL
Duckworth J.
7-6 6-3
Wu D.
Duckworth J.
71162
Wu D.
6930

James Duckworth defeated Di Wu 7-6 6-3 in the Nanchang CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Di Wu came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Duckworth J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wu D.

Wu D.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Duckworth J.

Serve advantage — Duckworth J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Duckworth J.Wu D.
1st serve in·Even
58%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
59%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
67%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.3
3.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 44). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Duckworth J.Wu D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
4
Break points saved·Dominant
97
37
Break points won·Clear edge
4
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
18
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Duckworth J.Wu D.
Freshness·
91
—

Duckworth J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Martin A.
Thompson J.[1]
6-41-66-3
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[1]
Ramanathan R.[4]
7-626-3
Martin A.
Milojevic N.[7]
6-06-4
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[1]
Soeda G.[11]
6-746-46-3
Ramanathan R.[4]
Zhang Z.
6-36-0
Milojevic N.[7]
Harris A.
6-24-66-0
Martin A.
Patael B.
6-27-5
R16
Milojevic N.[7]
Santillan A.
7-627-65
Harris A.
Pavlasek A.[13]
6-34-66-3
Thompson J.[1]
Safranek V.
6-26-1
Martin A.
Oliveira G.
6-46-2
Patael B.
Clarke J.[12]
6-37-5
Zhang Z.
Lopez Perez E.[8]
6-26-4
Ramanathan R.[4]
Uchida K.[16]
6-26-3
Soeda G.[11]
Duckworth J.[5]
7-56-1
R32
Ramanathan R.[4]
Te R.
6-36-2
Zhang Z.
Janvier M.[10]
7-652-1
Safranek V.
Ignatik U.[15]
7-666-4
Uchida K.[16]
Gabashvili T.
6-42-66-3
Harris A.
Vardhan V.
6-26-3
Pavlasek A.[13]
Chung Y.
6-36-2
Santillan A.
Nedovyesov A.[9]
6-44-67-5
Milojevic N.[7]
Mukund S.
6-26-4
Clarke J.[12]
Purcell M.
7-626-3
Patael B.
Kubler J.[6]
6-14-67-5
Duckworth J.[5]
Wu D.
7-696-3
Soeda G.[11]
Balaji N.
6-46-4
Thompson J.[1]
Grills J.
6-34-66-1
Lopez Perez E.[8]
Ochi M.
6-36-0
Martin A.
Bolt A.[3]
6-26-4
Oliveira G.
Lee D.[14]
6-36-2
R64
Mukund S.
Tokuda R.
6-13-1
Santillan A.
Lo C.
6-16-2
Safranek V.
Wu H.
3-66-16-3
Gabashvili T.
Xia Z.
6-27-5
Purcell M.
He Y.
7-626-2
Patael B.
Gao X.
6-16-4
Balaji N.
Bai Y.
2-66-27-64
Chung Y.
Noguchi R.
6-46-3
Oliveira G.
Banes M.
6-46-3
Grills J.
Saville L.
6-36-4
Harris A.
Margaroli L.
6-16-2
Martin A.
Lamasine T.
6-26-2
Te R.
Sun F.
6-46-4
Ochi M.
Wu T.
6-36-2
Zhang Z.
Myneni S.
6-46-4
Wu D.
Cui J.
6-16-2