Tommy Paul vs Martin Cuevas — Tallahassee CH Round of 32

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tommy Paul
USA9
Tommy Paul
#24ATP
1949ELO
1886Clay ELO
$1.7MYTD
$15MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 April 2019
clay
URU
Martin Cuevas
34 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLLW
Paul T.
6-1 6-4
Cuevas M.
Paul T.
662
Cuevas M.
140

Tommy Paul defeated Martin Cuevas 6-1 6-4 in the Tallahassee CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Paul T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Cuevas M.

Cuevas M.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Paul T.

Serve advantage — Paul T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Paul T.Cuevas M.
34
Serve
—
—
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Paul T.Cuevas M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
54%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.1
5.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 84). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paul T.Cuevas M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
93
14
Break points saved·Dominant
99
35
Break points won·Dominant
87
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
20
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Paul T.Cuevas M.
Freshness·
91
—

Paul T.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Gomez E.
Paul T.[9]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Gomez E.
Moutet C.[3]
6-16-4
Paul T.[9]
Sandgren T.[2]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Paul T.[9]
Torpegaard M.[13]
6-46-1
Moutet C.[3]
Nagal S.
6-21-67-5
Gomez E.
Serdarusic N.[16]
6-756-36-0
Sandgren T.[2]
Rubin N.[5]
7-56-1
R16
Moutet C.[3]
Tabilo A.
2-67-56-2
Gomez E.
Polmans M.[6]
6-46-2
Rubin N.[5]
Karlovskiy E.[12]
3-66-47-5
Sandgren T.[2]
Ehrat S.
6-36-756-4
Torpegaard M.[13]
Coria F.
6-35-76-3
Paul T.[9]
Krueger M.[7]
2-66-47-62
Serdarusic N.[16]
Collarini A.
3-66-26-3
Nagal S.
Arconada J.
7-646-1
R32
Nagal S.
Giraldo S.[10]
6-24-3
Moutet C.[3]
Gonzalez A.
6-24-2
Polmans M.[6]
Korda S.
7-636-736-4
Gomez E.
Moraing M.[11]
7-56-1
Serdarusic N.[16]
Altamirano C.
6-32-67-65
Karlovskiy E.[12]
Barrios Vera T.
6-31-66-3
Sandgren T.[2]
Kozlov S.
6-36-2
Rubin N.[5]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-2
Torpegaard M.[13]
Muller A.
6-23-66-4
Arconada J.
Ritschard A.
4-67-56-1
Collarini A.
Lorenzi P.[1]
6-26-746-4
Tabilo A.
Aragone J.[15]
6-36-2
Ehrat S.
Clezar G.[14]
6-777-56-2
Krueger M.[7]
Haerteis J.
3-66-46-1
Paul T.[9]
Cuevas M.
6-16-4
Coria F.
Polansky P.[4]
6-36-2
R64
Gomez E.
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Cuevas M.
Khan Z.
6-32-0
Ehrat S.
Karatsev A.
7-652-66-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Hassan B.
6-36-3
Nagal S.
Yevseyev D.
6-07-67
Barrios Vera T.
Rinderknech A.
7-636-3
Coria F.
Sels J.
6-16-2
Kozlov S.
Zhurbin A.
4-66-46-0
Muller A.
Blanch U.
7-616-3
Haerteis J.
Song E.
6-46-4
Altamirano C.
Shane R.
6-47-64
Gonzalez A.
Millot V.
6-26-3
Ritschard A.
Cid R.
6-43-66-4
Tabilo A.
Varillas J.
6-17-66
Korda S.
Zekic M.
6-46-2
Collarini A.
Bangoura S.
6-33-66-2