Tommy Paul vs Tennys Sandgren — Sarasota CH Final

Sarasota CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Tommy Paul
USA15
Tommy Paul
#24ATP
1949ELO
1886Clay ELO
$1.7MYTD
$15MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2019
clay
USA2
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Paul T.
6-3 6-4
Sandgren T.
Paul T.
662
Sandgren T.
340

Tommy Paul defeated Tennys Sandgren 6-3 6-4 in the Sarasota CH final on clay. The result followed the form book — Tommy Paul came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Tommy Paul extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Tommy Paul closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-08-16Cincinnati MastersQ2hardTommy Paul6-7(5) 7-6(4) 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Paul T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Sandgren T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Paul T.

Serve advantage — Paul T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Paul T.Sandgren T.
33
Serve
—
—
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Paul T.Sandgren T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.1
8.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paul T.Sandgren T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
93
36
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
92
Break points won·Dominant
87
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
28
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
96
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Paul T.Sandgren T.
Freshness·
91
—

Paul T.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Paul T.[15]
Sandgren T.[2]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Paul T.[15]
Collarini A.
6-16-3
Sandgren T.[2]
Giron M.[11]
7-622-66-2
Quarter-finals
Collarini A.
Karatsev A.
7-54-65-4
Paul T.[15]
Lorenzi P.[5]
6-34-66-4
Sandgren T.[2]
Polansky P.[8]
7-646-3
Giron M.[11]
Korda S.
6-16-4
R16
Lorenzi P.[5]
Rubin N.[9]
2-67-644-1
Polansky P.[8]
Brooksby J.
6-23-67-66
Paul T.[15]
Galan D.
2-66-16-1
Sandgren T.[2]
Clezar G.
7-656-2
Korda S.
Vukic A.
6-42-66-4
Collarini A.
Fratangelo B.[7]
6-41-66-3
Giron M.[11]
Laaksonen H.[6]
7-631-66-3
Karatsev A.
Dellien H.[1]
7-646-2
R32
Vukic A.
Song E.
6-23-66-0
Sandgren T.[2]
Shane R.
3-67-667-64
Collarini A.
Krueger M.[12]
7-654-67-65
Brooksby J.
Polmans M.[10]
6-36-0
Clezar G.
Koepfer D.[13]
6-726-37-5
Laaksonen H.[6]
Giraldo S.
6-46-4
Lorenzi P.[5]
Gomez E.
6-47-65
Rubin N.[9]
Cuevas M.
3-67-56-1
Paul T.[15]
Elias G.
6-16-2
Karatsev A.
Moraing M.[16]
6-37-66
Dellien H.[1]
Hardt N.
6-46-2
Galan D.
Klahn B.[3]
6-36-3
Polansky P.[8]
Altamirano C.
6-16-4
Korda S.
Ward J.[14]
6-46-736-1
Giron M.[11]
Rinderknech A.
7-57-64
Fratangelo B.[7]
Nagal S.
6-33-67-62
R64
Karatsev A.
Bangoura S.
7-56-746-1
Korda S.
Blanch U.
7-676-3
Clezar G.
Heliovaara H.
6-26-4
Brooksby J.
Hiltzik J.
6-16-2
Elias G.
Torpegaard M.
6-26-1
Galan D.
Khan Z.
7-56-2
Nagal S.
Sels J.
6-756-26-3
Collarini A.
Ehrat S.
6-46-0
Song E.
Aragone J.
6-36-0
Altamirano C.
Karlovskiy E.
6-746-46-4
Rinderknech A.
Yevseyev D.
6-34-66-3
Shane R.
Nguyen D.
7-657-5
Gomez E.
Zhurbin A.
6-26-4
Hardt N.
Redlicki M.
3-66-36-3
Cuevas M.
Gonzalez A.
6-46-2
Giraldo S.
Kwiatkowski T.
5-76-16-4