Sumit Nagal vs Jelle Sels — Sarasota CH Round of 64

Sarasota CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2019
clay
NED
Jelle Sels
#524ATP
1313ELO
1283Clay ELO
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLLW
Nagal S.
6-7 6-2 6-3
Sels J.
Nagal S.
65662
Sels J.
77231

Sumit Nagal defeated Jelle Sels 6-7 6-2 6-3 in the Sarasota CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Sels J.

Sels J.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Serve advantage — Nagal S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Sels J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.5
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Sels J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
15
Break points saved·Slight edge
69
61
Break points won·Dominant
35
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
16
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
11

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Sels J.
Freshness·Even
96
100

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Sels J.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Paul T.[15]
Sandgren T.[2]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Paul T.[15]
Collarini A.
6-16-3
Sandgren T.[2]
Giron M.[11]
7-622-66-2
Quarter-finals
Collarini A.
Karatsev A.
7-54-65-4
Paul T.[15]
Lorenzi P.[5]
6-34-66-4
Sandgren T.[2]
Polansky P.[8]
7-646-3
Giron M.[11]
Korda S.
6-16-4
R16
Lorenzi P.[5]
Rubin N.[9]
2-67-644-1
Polansky P.[8]
Brooksby J.
6-23-67-66
Paul T.[15]
Galan D.
2-66-16-1
Sandgren T.[2]
Clezar G.
7-656-2
Korda S.
Vukic A.
6-42-66-4
Collarini A.
Fratangelo B.[7]
6-41-66-3
Giron M.[11]
Laaksonen H.[6]
7-631-66-3
Karatsev A.
Dellien H.[1]
7-646-2
R32
Vukic A.
Song E.
6-23-66-0
Sandgren T.[2]
Shane R.
3-67-667-64
Collarini A.
Krueger M.[12]
7-654-67-65
Brooksby J.
Polmans M.[10]
6-36-0
Clezar G.
Koepfer D.[13]
6-726-37-5
Laaksonen H.[6]
Giraldo S.
6-46-4
Lorenzi P.[5]
Gomez E.
6-47-65
Rubin N.[9]
Cuevas M.
3-67-56-1
Paul T.[15]
Elias G.
6-16-2
Karatsev A.
Moraing M.[16]
6-37-66
Dellien H.[1]
Hardt N.
6-46-2
Galan D.
Klahn B.[3]
6-36-3
Polansky P.[8]
Altamirano C.
6-16-4
Korda S.
Ward J.[14]
6-46-736-1
Giron M.[11]
Rinderknech A.
7-57-64
Fratangelo B.[7]
Nagal S.
6-33-67-62
R64
Karatsev A.
Bangoura S.
7-56-746-1
Korda S.
Blanch U.
7-676-3
Clezar G.
Heliovaara H.
6-26-4
Brooksby J.
Hiltzik J.
6-16-2
Elias G.
Torpegaard M.
6-26-1
Galan D.
Khan Z.
7-56-2
Nagal S.
Sels J.
6-756-26-3
Collarini A.
Ehrat S.
6-46-0
Song E.
Aragone J.
6-36-0
Altamirano C.
Karlovskiy E.
6-746-46-4
Rinderknech A.
Yevseyev D.
6-34-66-3
Shane R.
Nguyen D.
7-657-5
Gomez E.
Zhurbin A.
6-26-4
Hardt N.
Redlicki M.
3-66-36-3
Cuevas M.
Gonzalez A.
6-46-2
Giraldo S.
Kwiatkowski T.
5-76-16-4