Pedro Sakamoto vs Alex Molcan — San Luis Potosi CH Round of 64

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Pedro Sakamoto
BRA
Pedro Sakamoto
#494ATP
1281ELO
1266Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2019
clay
Alex Molcan
SVK
Alex Molcan
#101ATP
1742ELO
1712Clay ELO
$295kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
28 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWLWWW
Sakamoto P.
6-4 6-2
Molcan A.
Sakamoto P.
662
Molcan A.
420

Pedro Sakamoto defeated Alex Molcan 6-4 6-2 in the San Luis Potosi CH round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Alex Molcan came in ranked #101.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sakamoto P.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Molcan A.

Molcan A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Sakamoto P.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sakamoto P.Molcan A.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Even
2.7
2.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sakamoto P.Molcan A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
13
79
Break points saved·Dominant
48
90
Break points won·Dominant
22
61
Deciding sets·Dominant
11
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
57
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Sakamoto P.Molcan A.
Freshness·Even
94
93

Sakamoto P.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 13 games (7d) · Molcan A.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Huesler M.
Menendez Maceiras A.[2]
7-57-63
Semi-finals
Menendez Maceiras A.[2]
Mena F.
4-66-37-5
Huesler M.
Sakamoto P.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Mena F.
Pavic A.
7-657-64
Menendez Maceiras A.[2]
Muller A.
6-06-2
Sakamoto P.
Barrios Vera T.
2-66-16-4
Huesler M.
Miedler L.[11]
4-67-56-3
R16
Muller A.
Menezes J.
3-66-36-4
Huesler M.
Escobar G.
6-46-756-4
Barrios Vera T.
Souza J.
W/O
Pavic A.
Escobedo E.
6-24-67-65
Sakamoto P.
Bublik A.[1]
6-37-5
Menendez Maceiras A.[2]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-26-4
Miedler L.[11]
Quiroz R.[6]
6-46-4
Mena F.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-26-4
R32
Muller A.
Smith J.[9]
6-44-67-65
Menendez Maceiras A.[2]
Sanchez M.
3-66-16-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Griekspoor S.[13]
6-46-4
Escobedo E.
Ofner S.[4]
7-52-66-4
Pavic A.
Cid R.[15]
6-31-66-3
Mena F.
Rola B.[10]
6-26-4
Escobar G.
Brown D.[3]
4-66-26-4
Souza J.
Safwat M.[8]
6-36-4
Sakamoto P.
Ortega Olmedo R.[14]
6-46-2
Bublik A.[1]
King K.
6-46-3
Menezes J.
Krstin P.[7]
6-16-1
Gomez Herrera C.
Basic M.[5]
5-76-26-1
Quiroz R.[6]
Tabilo A.
6-47-63
Barrios Vera T.
Arevalo M.[12]
6-46-4
Miedler L.[11]
Tipsarevic J.
7-53-66-3
Huesler M.
Petrovic D.[16]
6-36-4
R64
Sanchez M.
Nava E.
6-27-5
Muller A.
Mejia N.
7-657-5
Escobedo E.
Estrella V.
7-56-1
Pavic A.
Durasovic V.
4-66-37-5
Escobar G.
Varillas J.
7-56-3
Sakamoto P.
Molcan A.
6-46-2
King K.
King E.
7-676-746-3
Menezes J.
Franco Descotte M.
6-776-46-3
Barrios Vera T.
Olivo R.
6-46-2
Tabilo A.
Guinard M.
7-617-5
Mena F.
Takahashi Y.
4-66-36-0
Tipsarevic J.
Gomez L.
6-45-76-2
Souza J.
Lopez Villasenor G.
7-56-746-3
Huesler M.
Verbeek S.
6-16-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Crepatte B.
6-37-68
Gomez Herrera C.
Zekic M.
7-56-3