Pablo Cuevas vs Daniel Gimeno Traver — Tunis CH Quarter-final

Tunis CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
URU1
Pablo Cuevas
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2019
clay
ESP12
Daniel Gimeno Traver
40 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Cuevas P.
6-2 7-5
Gimeno Traver D.
Cuevas P.
672
Gimeno Traver D.
250

Pablo Cuevas defeated Daniel Gimeno Traver 6-2 7-5 in the Tunis CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Pablo Cuevas came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Pablo Cuevas extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Pablo Cuevas closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–5.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-04-11Monte Carlo MastersR64clayPablo Cuevas7-6(2) 6-7(2) 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Cuevas P.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gimeno Traver D.

Gimeno Traver D.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Cuevas P.

Serve advantage — Cuevas P.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cuevas P.Gimeno Traver D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
63%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
42%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
54%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
53%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
2.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.7
6.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (170 vs 46). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cuevas P.Gimeno Traver D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
15
Break points saved·Dominant
93
50
Break points won·Even
32
30
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
24
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
44
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cuevas P.[1]
Domingues J.
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Domingues J.
Bellucci T.
6-46-4
Cuevas P.[1]
Giustino L.[10]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Giustino L.[10]
Arguello F.[13]
2-66-36-4
Bellucci T.
Balazs A.
6-26-2
Domingues J.
Moroni G.
5-76-47-5
Cuevas P.[1]
Gimeno Traver D.[12]
6-27-5
R16
Balazs A.
Sousa P.[2]
4-66-36-2
Bellucci T.
Bemelmans R.[9]
2-66-36-3
Domingues J.
Coria F.
6-43-66-2
Moroni G.
Otte O.[6]
6-26-3
Giustino L.[10]
Tatlot J.
6-15-76-3
Arguello F.[13]
Mansouri S.
7-56-3
Gimeno Traver D.[12]
Gaio F.
7-56-3
Cuevas P.[1]
Troicki V.
7-56-4
R32
Gimeno Traver D.[12]
Galovic V.
7-56-1
Domingues J.
Garcia Lopez G.[3]
6-45-76-4
Otte O.[6]
Dima D.
7-657-67
Bemelmans R.[9]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-3
Sousa P.[2]
Vavassori A.
6-22-66-1
Balazs A.
Vatutin A.[16]
7-56-2
Bellucci T.
Halys Q.[7]
1-66-46-2
Moroni G.
Zopp J.[11]
6-46-736-2
Tatlot J.
Bagnis F.[5]
6-27-61
Giustino L.[10]
Kolar Z.
6-16-3
Mansouri S.
Martinez P.[4]
1-66-36-4
Gaio F.
Travaglia S.[8]
6-23-66-4
Troicki V.
Napolitano S.[15]
7-57-64
Cuevas P.[1]
Cachin P.
6-36-2
Arguello F.[13]
Brkic T.
6-46-3
Coria F.
Marcora R.[14]
6-36-4
R64
Galovic V.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-24-66-4
Troicki V.
Dougaz A.
6-746-43-0
Mansouri S.
Benchetrit E.
6-47-65
Tatlot J.
Sakharov G.
6-16-746-3
Balazs A.
Echargui M.
6-26-0
Vavassori A.
Escoffier A.
6-46-3
Serdarusic N.
Tseng C.
6-46-3
Bellucci T.
Masur D.
2-66-27-5
Domingues J.
Krawietz K.
6-26-4
Coria F.
Roca Batalla O.
6-24-66-4
Moroni G.
Bonadio R.
6-35-77-5
Dima D.
Setkic A.
6-46-4
Kolar Z.
Perez Sanz D.
6-46-3
Brkic T.
Vega Hernandez D.
6-36-1
Gaio F.
Bonzi B.
2-66-27-5
Cachin P.
Nedelko I.
6-36-2