Ante Pavic vs Roberto Cid — San Luis Potosi CH Round of 32

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CRO
Ante Pavic
37 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2019
clay
DOM15
Roberto Cid
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLW
Pavic A.
6-3 1-6 6-3
Cid R.
Pavic A.
6162
Cid R.
3631

Ante Pavic defeated Roberto Cid 6-3 1-6 6-3 in the San Luis Potosi CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Roberto Cid came in defending last year's final.

Key context

  • Match story: Ante Pavic closed it out in three sets, 6–3 1–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pavic A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Cid R.

Cid R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Pavic A.

Serve advantage — Cid R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pavic A.Cid R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
61%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
76%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
32%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.0
2.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
6.0
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (25 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pavic A.Cid R.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
7
0
Break points saved·Dominant
62
15
Break points won·Clear edge
2
26
Deciding sets·Clear edge
22
4
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
7
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Huesler M.
Menendez Maceiras A.[2]
7-57-63
Semi-finals
Menendez Maceiras A.[2]
Mena F.
4-66-37-5
Huesler M.
Sakamoto P.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Mena F.
Pavic A.
7-657-64
Menendez Maceiras A.[2]
Muller A.
6-06-2
Sakamoto P.
Barrios Vera T.
2-66-16-4
Huesler M.
Miedler L.[11]
4-67-56-3
R16
Muller A.
Menezes J.
3-66-36-4
Huesler M.
Escobar G.
6-46-756-4
Barrios Vera T.
Souza J.
W/O
Pavic A.
Escobedo E.
6-24-67-65
Sakamoto P.
Bublik A.[1]
6-37-5
Menendez Maceiras A.[2]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-26-4
Miedler L.[11]
Quiroz R.[6]
6-46-4
Mena F.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-26-4
R32
Muller A.
Smith J.[9]
6-44-67-65
Menendez Maceiras A.[2]
Sanchez M.
3-66-16-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Griekspoor S.[13]
6-46-4
Escobedo E.
Ofner S.[4]
7-52-66-4
Pavic A.
Cid R.[15]
6-31-66-3
Mena F.
Rola B.[10]
6-26-4
Escobar G.
Brown D.[3]
4-66-26-4
Souza J.
Safwat M.[8]
6-36-4
Sakamoto P.
Ortega Olmedo R.[14]
6-46-2
Bublik A.[1]
King K.
6-46-3
Menezes J.
Krstin P.[7]
6-16-1
Gomez Herrera C.
Basic M.[5]
5-76-26-1
Quiroz R.[6]
Tabilo A.
6-47-63
Barrios Vera T.
Arevalo M.[12]
6-46-4
Miedler L.[11]
Tipsarevic J.
7-53-66-3
Huesler M.
Petrovic D.[16]
6-36-4
R64
Sanchez M.
Nava E.
6-27-5
Muller A.
Mejia N.
7-657-5
Escobedo E.
Estrella V.
7-56-1
Pavic A.
Durasovic V.
4-66-37-5
Escobar G.
Varillas J.
7-56-3
Sakamoto P.
Molcan A.
6-46-2
King K.
King E.
7-676-746-3
Menezes J.
Franco Descotte M.
6-776-46-3
Barrios Vera T.
Olivo R.
6-46-2
Tabilo A.
Guinard M.
7-617-5
Mena F.
Takahashi Y.
4-66-36-0
Tipsarevic J.
Gomez L.
6-45-76-2
Souza J.
Lopez Villasenor G.
7-56-746-3
Huesler M.
Verbeek S.
6-16-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Crepatte B.
6-37-68
Gomez Herrera C.
Zekic M.
7-56-3