Attila Balazs vs Moez Echargui — Tunis CH Round of 64

Tunis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
HUN
Attila Balazs
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 April 2019
clay
Moez Echargui
TUN
Moez Echargui
#151ATP
1416ELO
1342Clay ELO
$171kYTD
$469kCAREER
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Balazs A.
6-2 6-0
Echargui M.
Balazs A.
662
Echargui M.
200

Attila Balazs defeated Moez Echargui 6-2 6-0 in the Tunis CH round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Moez Echargui came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Balazs A.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Echargui M.

Echargui M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Balazs A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Balazs A.Echargui M.
1st serve in·Even
58%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.1
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.0
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (89 vs 195). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Balazs A.Echargui M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
45
4
Break points saved·Dominant
82
48
Break points won·Clear edge
35
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
51
4
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
54
42

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Balazs A.Echargui M.
Freshness·
—
100

Echargui M.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cuevas P.[1]
Domingues J.
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Domingues J.
Bellucci T.
6-46-4
Cuevas P.[1]
Giustino L.[10]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Giustino L.[10]
Arguello F.[13]
2-66-36-4
Bellucci T.
Balazs A.
6-26-2
Domingues J.
Moroni G.
5-76-47-5
Cuevas P.[1]
Gimeno Traver D.[12]
6-27-5
R16
Balazs A.
Sousa P.[2]
4-66-36-2
Bellucci T.
Bemelmans R.[9]
2-66-36-3
Domingues J.
Coria F.
6-43-66-2
Moroni G.
Otte O.[6]
6-26-3
Giustino L.[10]
Tatlot J.
6-15-76-3
Arguello F.[13]
Mansouri S.
7-56-3
Gimeno Traver D.[12]
Gaio F.
7-56-3
Cuevas P.[1]
Troicki V.
7-56-4
R32
Gimeno Traver D.[12]
Galovic V.
7-56-1
Domingues J.
Garcia Lopez G.[3]
6-45-76-4
Otte O.[6]
Dima D.
7-657-67
Bemelmans R.[9]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-3
Sousa P.[2]
Vavassori A.
6-22-66-1
Balazs A.
Vatutin A.[16]
7-56-2
Bellucci T.
Halys Q.[7]
1-66-46-2
Moroni G.
Zopp J.[11]
6-46-736-2
Tatlot J.
Bagnis F.[5]
6-27-61
Giustino L.[10]
Kolar Z.
6-16-3
Mansouri S.
Martinez P.[4]
1-66-36-4
Gaio F.
Travaglia S.[8]
6-23-66-4
Troicki V.
Napolitano S.[15]
7-57-64
Cuevas P.[1]
Cachin P.
6-36-2
Arguello F.[13]
Brkic T.
6-46-3
Coria F.
Marcora R.[14]
6-36-4
R64
Galovic V.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-24-66-4
Troicki V.
Dougaz A.
6-746-43-0
Mansouri S.
Benchetrit E.
6-47-65
Tatlot J.
Sakharov G.
6-16-746-3
Balazs A.
Echargui M.
6-26-0
Vavassori A.
Escoffier A.
6-46-3
Serdarusic N.
Tseng C.
6-46-3
Bellucci T.
Masur D.
2-66-27-5
Domingues J.
Krawietz K.
6-26-4
Coria F.
Roca Batalla O.
6-24-66-4
Moroni G.
Bonadio R.
6-35-77-5
Dima D.
Setkic A.
6-46-4
Kolar Z.
Perez Sanz D.
6-46-3
Brkic T.
Vega Hernandez D.
6-36-1
Gaio F.
Bonzi B.
2-66-27-5
Cachin P.
Nedelko I.
6-36-2