Jason Jung vs Tung Lin Wu — Taipei CH Round of 32

Taipei CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jason Jung
TPE7
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 April 2019
hard
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Jung J.
6-4 6-4
Wu T.
Jung J.
662
Wu T.
440

Jason Jung defeated Tung Lin Wu 6-4 6-4 in the Taipei CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tung Lin Wu came in ranked #329, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Jason Jung edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jung J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jung J.Wu T.
1st serve in·Even
64%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jung J.Wu T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
21
10
Break points saved·Clear edge
64
84
Break points won·Even
8
6
Deciding sets·Clear edge
21
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Jung J.Wu T.
Freshness·Clear edge
75
88

Jung J.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d) · Wu T.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Novak D.[11]
Stakhovsky S.[3]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Soeda G.
7-647-64
Novak D.[11]
Kwon S.[13]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Soeda G.
Jung J.[7]
7-636-1
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Ito T.[10]
7-636-756-4
Kwon S.[13]
Ramanathan R.[9]
7-666-3
Novak D.[11]
Sugita Y.[15]
7-656-3
R16
Ito T.[10]
Majchrzak K.[6]
6-737-677-62
Kwon S.[13]
Harris L.[1]
7-56-736-3
Sugita Y.[15]
Lacko L.[4]
3-66-36-4
Soeda G.
Harris A.
6-26-3
Jung J.[7]
Duckworth J.[12]
6-26-2
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Janvier M.[16]
7-56-4
Novak D.[11]
Uchida K.
6-36-766-4
Ramanathan R.[9]
Lo C.
4-66-36-2
R32
Lo C.
Baghdatis M.[8]
6-714-2
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Robert S.
7-626-2
Soeda G.
Donskoy E.[2]
4-66-47-65
Harris A.
Moriya H.[14]
4-66-46-4
Jung J.[7]
Wu T.
6-46-4
Janvier M.[16]
Wang T.
6-47-5
Ito T.[10]
Lee K.
6-36-3
Majchrzak K.[6]
Santillan A.
6-36-1
Novak D.[11]
Tokuda R.
6-26-2
Sugita Y.[15]
Ilkel C.
7-56-3
Lacko L.[4]
Huesler M.
4-67-606-2
Kwon S.[13]
Saville L.
6-46-4
Harris L.[1]
Klein B.
7-676-2
Duckworth J.[12]
Yang T.
7-666-0
Ramanathan R.[9]
Banes M.
6-36-2
Uchida K.
Bachinger M.[5]
7-666-2
R64
Ilkel C.
Mukund S.
6-36-4
Soeda G.
Uchiyama Y.
6-786-46-2
Harris A.
Myneni S.
7-644-66-2
Wu T.
Yu C.
6-46-3
Robert S.
Oliveira G.
6-36-4
Wang T.
Marchenko I.
4-66-36-4
Lee K.
Ho R.
6-46-2
Santillan A.
Hsu Y.
6-47-65
Uchida K.
Lee D.
6-46-4
Tokuda R.
Takahashi Y.
6-26-1
Huesler M.
Purcell M.
7-646-756-1
Lo C.
Altamirano C.
7-55-76-3
Banes M.
Chung Y.
2-67-656-4
Saville L.
Balaji N.
6-46-746-4
Klein B.
Hsieh C.
6-37-5
Yang T.
Ochi M.
6-46-3