Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Tatsuma Ito — Taipei CH Quarter-final

Taipei CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
UKR3
Sergiy Stakhovsky
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 April 2019
hard
JPN10
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
Stakhovsky S.
7-6 6-7 6-4
Ito T.
Stakhovsky S.
776562
Ito T.
637741

Sergiy Stakhovsky defeated Tatsuma Ito 7-6 6-7 6-4 in the Taipei CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Sergiy Stakhovsky came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Sergiy Stakhovsky extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-07-03WimbledonQ3grassSergiy Stakhovsky6-3 6-7(1) 6-7(6) 6-4 8-6
2013-02-04MontpellierR16hardSergiy Stakhovsky6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(3)

Serve vs return

This season
Stakhovsky S.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Ito T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Stakhovsky S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stakhovsky S.Ito T.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.4
3.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (140 vs 130). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stakhovsky S.Ito T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
41
24
Break points saved·Dominant
88
61
Break points won·Slight edge
3
9
Deciding sets·Clear edge
57
43
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
59
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Novak D.[11]
Stakhovsky S.[3]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Soeda G.
7-647-64
Novak D.[11]
Kwon S.[13]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Soeda G.
Jung J.[7]
7-636-1
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Ito T.[10]
7-636-756-4
Kwon S.[13]
Ramanathan R.[9]
7-666-3
Novak D.[11]
Sugita Y.[15]
7-656-3
R16
Ito T.[10]
Majchrzak K.[6]
6-737-677-62
Kwon S.[13]
Harris L.[1]
7-56-736-3
Sugita Y.[15]
Lacko L.[4]
3-66-36-4
Soeda G.
Harris A.
6-26-3
Jung J.[7]
Duckworth J.[12]
6-26-2
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Janvier M.[16]
7-56-4
Novak D.[11]
Uchida K.
6-36-766-4
Ramanathan R.[9]
Lo C.
4-66-36-2
R32
Lo C.
Baghdatis M.[8]
6-714-2
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Robert S.
7-626-2
Soeda G.
Donskoy E.[2]
4-66-47-65
Harris A.
Moriya H.[14]
4-66-46-4
Jung J.[7]
Wu T.
6-46-4
Janvier M.[16]
Wang T.
6-47-5
Ito T.[10]
Lee K.
6-36-3
Majchrzak K.[6]
Santillan A.
6-36-1
Novak D.[11]
Tokuda R.
6-26-2
Sugita Y.[15]
Ilkel C.
7-56-3
Lacko L.[4]
Huesler M.
4-67-606-2
Kwon S.[13]
Saville L.
6-46-4
Harris L.[1]
Klein B.
7-676-2
Duckworth J.[12]
Yang T.
7-666-0
Ramanathan R.[9]
Banes M.
6-36-2
Uchida K.
Bachinger M.[5]
7-666-2
R64
Ilkel C.
Mukund S.
6-36-4
Soeda G.
Uchiyama Y.
6-786-46-2
Harris A.
Myneni S.
7-644-66-2
Wu T.
Yu C.
6-46-3
Robert S.
Oliveira G.
6-36-4
Wang T.
Marchenko I.
4-66-36-4
Lee K.
Ho R.
6-46-2
Santillan A.
Hsu Y.
6-47-65
Uchida K.
Lee D.
6-46-4
Tokuda R.
Takahashi Y.
6-26-1
Huesler M.
Purcell M.
7-646-756-1
Lo C.
Altamirano C.
7-55-76-3
Banes M.
Chung Y.
2-67-656-4
Saville L.
Balaji N.
6-46-746-4
Klein B.
Hsieh C.
6-37-5
Yang T.
Ochi M.
6-46-3