Tatsuma Ito vs Kamil Majchrzak — Taipei CH Round of 16

Taipei CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
JPN10
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 April 2019
hard
Kamil Majchrzak
POL6
Kamil Majchrzak
#66ATP
1801ELO
1739Hard ELO
$617kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
30 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWLW
Ito T.
6-7 7-6 7-6
Majchrzak K.
Ito T.
6379772
Majchrzak K.
7767621

Tatsuma Ito defeated Kamil Majchrzak 6-7 7-6 7-6 in the Taipei CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ito T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Majchrzak K.

Majchrzak K.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Serve advantage — Majchrzak K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ito T.Majchrzak K.
—
Serve
24
—
Return
48

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ito T.Majchrzak K.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.6
5.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.4
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (130 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ito T.Majchrzak K.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
68
Break points saved·Dominant
61
97
Break points won·Dominant
9
51
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
73
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ito T.Majchrzak K.
Freshness·
—
90

Majchrzak K.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Novak D.[11]
Stakhovsky S.[3]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Soeda G.
7-647-64
Novak D.[11]
Kwon S.[13]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Soeda G.
Jung J.[7]
7-636-1
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Ito T.[10]
7-636-756-4
Kwon S.[13]
Ramanathan R.[9]
7-666-3
Novak D.[11]
Sugita Y.[15]
7-656-3
R16
Ito T.[10]
Majchrzak K.[6]
6-737-677-62
Kwon S.[13]
Harris L.[1]
7-56-736-3
Sugita Y.[15]
Lacko L.[4]
3-66-36-4
Soeda G.
Harris A.
6-26-3
Jung J.[7]
Duckworth J.[12]
6-26-2
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Janvier M.[16]
7-56-4
Novak D.[11]
Uchida K.
6-36-766-4
Ramanathan R.[9]
Lo C.
4-66-36-2
R32
Lo C.
Baghdatis M.[8]
6-714-2
Stakhovsky S.[3]
Robert S.
7-626-2
Soeda G.
Donskoy E.[2]
4-66-47-65
Harris A.
Moriya H.[14]
4-66-46-4
Jung J.[7]
Wu T.
6-46-4
Janvier M.[16]
Wang T.
6-47-5
Ito T.[10]
Lee K.
6-36-3
Majchrzak K.[6]
Santillan A.
6-36-1
Novak D.[11]
Tokuda R.
6-26-2
Sugita Y.[15]
Ilkel C.
7-56-3
Lacko L.[4]
Huesler M.
4-67-606-2
Kwon S.[13]
Saville L.
6-46-4
Harris L.[1]
Klein B.
7-676-2
Duckworth J.[12]
Yang T.
7-666-0
Ramanathan R.[9]
Banes M.
6-36-2
Uchida K.
Bachinger M.[5]
7-666-2
R64
Ilkel C.
Mukund S.
6-36-4
Soeda G.
Uchiyama Y.
6-786-46-2
Harris A.
Myneni S.
7-644-66-2
Wu T.
Yu C.
6-46-3
Robert S.
Oliveira G.
6-36-4
Wang T.
Marchenko I.
4-66-36-4
Lee K.
Ho R.
6-46-2
Santillan A.
Hsu Y.
6-47-65
Uchida K.
Lee D.
6-46-4
Tokuda R.
Takahashi Y.
6-26-1
Huesler M.
Purcell M.
7-646-756-1
Lo C.
Altamirano C.
7-55-76-3
Banes M.
Chung Y.
2-67-656-4
Saville L.
Balaji N.
6-46-746-4
Klein B.
Hsieh C.
6-37-5
Yang T.
Ochi M.
6-46-3