Federico Gaio vs Tobias Kamke — Murcia CH Round of 64

Murcia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
ITA
Federico Gaio
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 April 2019
clay
GER
Tobias Kamke
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
Gaio F.
6-1 6-4
Kamke T.
Gaio F.
662
Kamke T.
140

Federico Gaio defeated Tobias Kamke 6-1 6-4 in the Murcia CH round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Tobias Kamke came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, but Federico Gaio had been the form player, winning 5 of their last 8 on clay. Federico Gaio claimed a first win over Tobias Kamke in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-01-17Australian OpenQ1hardTobias Kamke6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Gaio F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Kamke T.

Kamke T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gaio F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gaio F.Kamke T.
1st serve in·Even
57%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
1.9
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 137). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gaio F.Kamke T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
20
14
Break points saved·Slight edge
76
69
Break points won·Clear edge
3
22
Deciding sets·Clear edge
40
17
Tiebreaks·Even
7
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Ymer M.[14]
2-66-06-2
Semi-finals
Ymer M.[14]
Griekspoor T.[15]
W/O
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Coppejans K.[13]
4-66-26-3
Quarter-finals
Coppejans K.[13]
Zapata Miralles B.
1-67-687-5
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Lopez Perez E.[12]
6-16-737-62
Ymer M.[14]
Molleker R.[9]
7-56-0
Griekspoor T.[15]
Caruso S.[6]
7-646-4
R16
Lopez Perez E.[12]
Hernandez J.
6-43-1
Molleker R.[9]
Alcaraz C.
6-16-756-3
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Gutierrez Ferrol S.[16]
6-16-4
Zapata Miralles B.
Vilella Martinez M.
7-616-4
Ymer M.[14]
Brancaccio R.
7-56-3
Caruso S.[6]
Cachin P.
6-26-4
Griekspoor T.[15]
Sousa P.[1]
7-57-66
Coppejans K.[13]
Rosol L.[4]
7-52-67-5
R32
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Gaio F.
6-06-4
Zapata Miralles B.
De Greef A.[8]
6-46-1
Brancaccio R.
Monteiro T.[3]
4-66-47-61
Lopez Perez E.[12]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-16-3
Hernandez J.
Bemelmans R.[7]
3-67-56-2
Gutierrez Ferrol S.[16]
Bellucci T.
7-646-3
Rosol L.[4]
Bonzi B.
2-66-47-5
Coppejans K.[13]
Balazs A.
6-43-66-3
Vilella Martinez M.
Arguello F.[11]
6-16-4
Alcaraz C.
Martinez P.[5]
6-37-64
Molleker R.[9]
Robredo T.
6-34-66-2
Ymer M.[14]
Choinski J.
6-26-4
Caruso S.[6]
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-07-5
Cachin P.
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
3-66-36-3
Griekspoor T.[15]
Roca Batalla O.
3-66-27-65
Sousa P.[1]
Granollers G.
6-26-3
R64
Alcaraz C.
Sakharov G.
7-666-4
Roca Batalla O.
Riba P.
6-44-65-3
Hernandez J.
Vavassori A.
6-23-67-63
Balazs A.
Bonadio R.
6-26-1
Brancaccio R.
Neis F.
6-737-626-3
Gaio F.
Kamke T.
6-16-4
Bellucci T.
Domingues J.
3-66-46-0
Ortega Olmedo R.
Lopez Montagud C.
6-46-1
Bonzi B.
Gakhov I.
6-33-66-3
Vilella Martinez M.
Almagro N.
6-26-2
Zapata Miralles B.
Tatlot J.
6-21-66-1
Robredo T.
Petrovic D.
6-22-66-4
Choinski J.
Vega Hernandez D.
6-36-3
Boluda Purkiss C.
Nedelko I.
6-26-0
Cachin P.
Miedler L.
6-36-3
Granollers G.
Perez Sanz D.
6-36-2