Emilio Gomez vs Casper Ruud — Monterrey CH Round of 32

Monterrey CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ECU
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 April 2019
hard
Casper Ruud
NOR4
Casper Ruud
#13ATP
1983ELO
1889Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
Gomez E.
6-2 6-4
Ruud C.
Gomez E.
662
Ruud C.
240

Emilio Gomez defeated Casper Ruud 6-2 6-4 in the Monterrey CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez E.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Ruud C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Serve advantage — Ruud C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gomez E.Ruud C.
—
Serve
59
—
Return
31

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gomez E.Ruud C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
66%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
5.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez E.Ruud C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
91
Break points saved·Clear edge
77
99
Break points won·Dominant
19
75
Deciding sets·Dominant
23
99
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
79
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gomez E.Ruud C.
Freshness·
—
100

Ruud C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bublik A.[7]
Gomez E.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Gomez E.
Young D.
2-66-36-4
Bublik A.[7]
Sandgren T.[1]
2-66-27-65
Quarter-finals
Bublik A.[7]
Lopez F.[3]
7-656-3
Sandgren T.[1]
Giron M.[12]
6-16-746-0
Young D.
Klahn B.[2]
7-56-4
Gomez E.
Polansky P.[8]
6-37-65
R16
Bublik A.[7]
Krueger M.[10]
7-626-3
Polansky P.[8]
Eubanks C.[9]
7-637-64
Lopez F.[3]
Koepfer D.[14]
7-646-2
Sandgren T.[1]
King D.[16]
7-654-66-2
Gomez E.
Pavic A.
6-16-0
Klahn B.[2]
Ofner S.[15]
6-36-3
Young D.
Giraldo S.
6-36-4
Giron M.[12]
Granollers M.[6]
4-66-36-4
R32
King D.[16]
King E.
4-67-636-1
Koepfer D.[14]
Barrios Vera T.
7-627-64
Polansky P.[8]
Tipsarevic J.
6-36-2
Lopez F.[3]
Gomez Herrera C.
7-636-4
Klahn B.[2]
Song E.
6-46-3
Ofner S.[15]
Estrella V.
7-631-66-4
Giraldo S.
Quiroz R.[11]
3-67-57-61
Young D.
Lorenzi P.[5]
6-46-3
Gomez E.
Ruud C.[4]
6-26-4
Pavic A.
Ward J.[13]
7-57-63
Eubanks C.[9]
Smith J.
6-36-737-5
Bublik A.[7]
Krstin P.
1-66-36-4
Krueger M.[10]
King K.
7-666-3
Granollers M.[6]
Galan D.
6-36-4
Giron M.[12]
Nava E.
6-46-2
Sandgren T.[1]
Olivo R.
4-67-676-2
R64
Smith J.
Sanchez M.
6-46-2
Nava E.
Gojo B.
6-43-66-4
Galan D.
Przysiezny M.
6-46-4
King E.
Mejia N.
6-43-66-3
Olivo R.
Uchida K.
6-47-5
Barrios Vera T.
Aragone J.
3-66-36-4
Gomez Herrera C.
Altamirano C.
6-16-4
Song E.
Franco Descotte M.
2-66-36-0
Estrella V.
Patino L.
6-13-66-1
Giraldo S.
Cid R.
7-646-3
Young D.
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-46-4
Gomez E.
Collarini A.
7-56-2
Pavic A.
Escobar G.
6-22-67-5
Tipsarevic J.
Smith R.
7-636-4
Krstin P.
Gomez L.
6-06-3
King K.
Escobedo E.
7-656-4