Emilio Nava vs Borna Gojo — Monterrey CH Round of 64

Monterrey CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 April 2019
hard
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Nava E.
6-4 3-6 6-4
Gojo B.
Nava E.
6362
Gojo B.
4641

Emilio Nava defeated Borna Gojo 6-4 3-6 6-4 in the Monterrey CH round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

  • Match story: Emilio Nava closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Gojo B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nava E.Gojo B.
40
Serve
—
16
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Gojo B.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
64%
66%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.7
10.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Gojo B.
Clutch Rating·Even
52
53
Break points saved·Even
94
95
Break points won·Slight edge
17
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
89
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Gojo B.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Nava E.: 15 days rest · Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bublik A.[7]
Gomez E.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Gomez E.
Young D.
2-66-36-4
Bublik A.[7]
Sandgren T.[1]
2-66-27-65
Quarter-finals
Bublik A.[7]
Lopez F.[3]
7-656-3
Sandgren T.[1]
Giron M.[12]
6-16-746-0
Young D.
Klahn B.[2]
7-56-4
Gomez E.
Polansky P.[8]
6-37-65
R16
Bublik A.[7]
Krueger M.[10]
7-626-3
Polansky P.[8]
Eubanks C.[9]
7-637-64
Lopez F.[3]
Koepfer D.[14]
7-646-2
Sandgren T.[1]
King D.[16]
7-654-66-2
Gomez E.
Pavic A.
6-16-0
Klahn B.[2]
Ofner S.[15]
6-36-3
Young D.
Giraldo S.
6-36-4
Giron M.[12]
Granollers M.[6]
4-66-36-4
R32
King D.[16]
King E.
4-67-636-1
Koepfer D.[14]
Barrios Vera T.
7-627-64
Polansky P.[8]
Tipsarevic J.
6-36-2
Lopez F.[3]
Gomez Herrera C.
7-636-4
Klahn B.[2]
Song E.
6-46-3
Ofner S.[15]
Estrella V.
7-631-66-4
Giraldo S.
Quiroz R.[11]
3-67-57-61
Young D.
Lorenzi P.[5]
6-46-3
Gomez E.
Ruud C.[4]
6-26-4
Pavic A.
Ward J.[13]
7-57-63
Eubanks C.[9]
Smith J.
6-36-737-5
Bublik A.[7]
Krstin P.
1-66-36-4
Krueger M.[10]
King K.
7-666-3
Granollers M.[6]
Galan D.
6-36-4
Giron M.[12]
Nava E.
6-46-2
Sandgren T.[1]
Olivo R.
4-67-676-2
R64
Smith J.
Sanchez M.
6-46-2
Nava E.
Gojo B.
6-43-66-4
Galan D.
Przysiezny M.
6-46-4
King E.
Mejia N.
6-43-66-3
Olivo R.
Uchida K.
6-47-5
Barrios Vera T.
Aragone J.
3-66-36-4
Gomez Herrera C.
Altamirano C.
6-16-4
Song E.
Franco Descotte M.
2-66-36-0
Estrella V.
Patino L.
6-13-66-1
Giraldo S.
Cid R.
7-646-3
Young D.
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-46-4
Gomez E.
Collarini A.
7-56-2
Pavic A.
Escobar G.
6-22-67-5
Tipsarevic J.
Smith R.
7-636-4
Krstin P.
Gomez L.
6-06-3
King K.
Escobedo E.
7-656-4