Alexander Bublik vs Emilio Gomez — Monterrey CH Final

Monterrey CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Alexander Bublik
KAZ7
Alexander Bublik
#11ATP
1889ELO
1837Hard ELO
$1.2MYTD
$12MCAREER
29 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 April 2019
hard
ECU
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Bublik A.
6-3 6-2
Gomez E.
Bublik A.
662
Gomez E.
320

Alexander Bublik defeated Emilio Gomez 6-3 6-2 in the Monterrey CH final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bublik A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Bublik A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Bublik A.Gomez E.
65
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bublik A.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.8
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bublik A.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
77
Break points won·Dominant
67
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
23
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
96
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Bublik A.Gomez E.
Freshness·
78
—

Bublik A.: 8 days rest · 4 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bublik A.[7]
Gomez E.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Gomez E.
Young D.
2-66-36-4
Bublik A.[7]
Sandgren T.[1]
2-66-27-65
Quarter-finals
Bublik A.[7]
Lopez F.[3]
7-656-3
Sandgren T.[1]
Giron M.[12]
6-16-746-0
Young D.
Klahn B.[2]
7-56-4
Gomez E.
Polansky P.[8]
6-37-65
R16
Bublik A.[7]
Krueger M.[10]
7-626-3
Polansky P.[8]
Eubanks C.[9]
7-637-64
Lopez F.[3]
Koepfer D.[14]
7-646-2
Sandgren T.[1]
King D.[16]
7-654-66-2
Gomez E.
Pavic A.
6-16-0
Klahn B.[2]
Ofner S.[15]
6-36-3
Young D.
Giraldo S.
6-36-4
Giron M.[12]
Granollers M.[6]
4-66-36-4
R32
King D.[16]
King E.
4-67-636-1
Koepfer D.[14]
Barrios Vera T.
7-627-64
Polansky P.[8]
Tipsarevic J.
6-36-2
Lopez F.[3]
Gomez Herrera C.
7-636-4
Klahn B.[2]
Song E.
6-46-3
Ofner S.[15]
Estrella V.
7-631-66-4
Giraldo S.
Quiroz R.[11]
3-67-57-61
Young D.
Lorenzi P.[5]
6-46-3
Gomez E.
Ruud C.[4]
6-26-4
Pavic A.
Ward J.[13]
7-57-63
Eubanks C.[9]
Smith J.
6-36-737-5
Bublik A.[7]
Krstin P.
1-66-36-4
Krueger M.[10]
King K.
7-666-3
Granollers M.[6]
Galan D.
6-36-4
Giron M.[12]
Nava E.
6-46-2
Sandgren T.[1]
Olivo R.
4-67-676-2
R64
Smith J.
Sanchez M.
6-46-2
Nava E.
Gojo B.
6-43-66-4
Galan D.
Przysiezny M.
6-46-4
King E.
Mejia N.
6-43-66-3
Olivo R.
Uchida K.
6-47-5
Barrios Vera T.
Aragone J.
3-66-36-4
Gomez Herrera C.
Altamirano C.
6-16-4
Song E.
Franco Descotte M.
2-66-36-0
Estrella V.
Patino L.
6-13-66-1
Giraldo S.
Cid R.
7-646-3
Young D.
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-46-4
Gomez E.
Collarini A.
7-56-2
Pavic A.
Escobar G.
6-22-67-5
Tipsarevic J.
Smith R.
7-636-4
Krstin P.
Gomez L.
6-06-3
King K.
Escobedo E.
7-656-4