Frances Tiafoe vs Miomir Kecmanovic — Miami Masters Round of 64

Miami Masters · ATP · Round of 64
Frances Tiafoe
USA28
Frances Tiafoe
#17ATP
1918ELO
1861Hard ELO
$1.9MYTD
$18MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 March 2019
hard
Miomir Kecmanovic
SRB
Miomir Kecmanovic
#59ATP
1768ELO
1709Hard ELO
$756kYTD
$9.0MCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLLWWW
Tiafoe F.
7-6 7-6
Kecmanovic M.
Tiafoe F.
78772
Kecmanovic M.
66650

Frances Tiafoe defeated Miomir Kecmanovic 7-6 7-6 in the Miami Masters round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Frances Tiafoe came in ranked #17, leading the head-to-head 4–0, defending last year's round of 16. Frances Tiafoe extended the head-to-head to 5–0.

Key context

Head to head

4–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-04-07Monte Carlo MastersR64clayFrances Tiafoe6-2 5-7 7-6(5)
2024-01-01Hong KongR16hardFrances Tiafoe6-3 7-6(4)
2022-10-03TokyoQFhardFrances Tiafoe6-0 6-4
2020-10-26Nur-SultanR16hardFrances Tiafoe7-5 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Tiafoe F.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Kecmanovic M.

Kecmanovic M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Tiafoe F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tiafoe F.Kecmanovic M.
38
Serve
34
37
Return
45

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tiafoe F.Kecmanovic M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.0
4.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tiafoe F.Kecmanovic M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
83
66
Break points saved·Even
99
98
Break points won·Slight edge
57
67
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
56
Tiebreaks·Dominant
98
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Tiafoe F.Kecmanovic M.
Freshness·Clear edge
79
96

Tiafoe F.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Kecmanovic M.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°CDrizzle
Wind 10 km/hHumidity 70%
Final
Federer R.[4]
Isner J.[7]
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Isner J.[7]
Auger Aliassime F.
7-637-64
Federer R.[4]
Shapovalov D.[20]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Auger Aliassime F.
Coric B.[11]
7-636-2
Shapovalov D.[20]
Tiafoe F.[28]
6-756-46-2
Isner J.[7]
Bautista Agut R.[22]
7-617-65
Federer R.[4]
Anderson K.[6]
6-06-4
R16
Isner J.[7]
Edmund K.[19]
7-657-63
Bautista Agut R.[22]
Djokovic N.[1]
1-67-56-3
Coric B.[11]
Kyrgios N.[27]
4-66-36-2
Anderson K.[6]
Thompson J.
7-57-5
Federer R.[4]
Medvedev D.[13]
6-46-2
Shapovalov D.[20]
Tsitsipas S.[8]
4-66-37-63
Tiafoe F.[28]
Goffin D.[18]
7-57-66
Auger Aliassime F.
Basilashvili N.[17]
7-646-4
R32
Medvedev D.[13]
Opelka R.
7-656-757-60
Djokovic N.[1]
Delbonis F.
7-54-66-1
Edmund K.[19]
Raonic M.[12]
6-46-4
Basilashvili N.[17]
Haase R.
7-636-3
Coric B.[11]
Chardy J.
6-726-26-3
Kyrgios N.[27]
Lajovic D.
6-36-1
Thompson J.
Dimitrov G.[24]
7-57-5
Tsitsipas S.[8]
Mayer L.
6-46-4
Shapovalov D.[20]
Rublev A.
6-37-65
Goffin D.[18]
Cecchinato M.[14]
6-46-4
Federer R.[4]
Krajinovic F.
7-56-3
Isner J.[7]
Ramos A.
7-57-66
Tiafoe F.[28]
Ferrer D.
5-76-36-3
Anderson K.[6]
Sousa J.
6-47-66
Bautista Agut R.[22]
Fognini F.[15]
6-46-4
Auger Aliassime F.
Hurkacz H.
7-656-4
R64
Isner J.[7]
Sonego L.
7-627-67
Djokovic N.[1]
Tomic B.
7-626-2
Bautista Agut R.[22]
Tipsarevic J.
7-636-4
Edmund K.[19]
Ivashka I.
6-36-2
Ramos A.
Pouille L.[25]
4-66-46-3
Hurkacz H.
Thiem D.[3]
6-46-4
Basilashvili N.[17]
Zverev M.
6-36-2
Haase R.
Harris L.
3-66-36-4
Kyrgios N.[27]
Bublik A.
7-56-3
Lajovic D.
Nishikori K.[5]
2-66-26-3
Anderson K.[6]
Munar J.
6-43-66-3
Sousa J.
Johnson S.[31]
7-666-4
Thompson J.
Khachanov K.[10]
6-26-3
Opelka R.
Schwartzman D.[21]
6-43-66-4
Federer R.[4]
Albot R.
4-67-56-3
Tsitsipas S.[8]
Mcdonald M.
7-646-1
Mayer L.
Pella G.[26]
6-26-4
Shapovalov D.[20]
Evans D.
4-66-16-3
Rublev A.
Cilic M.[9]
6-46-4
Ferrer D.
Zverev A.[2]
2-67-56-3
Delbonis F.
Millman J.[32]
7-53-67-62
Dimitrov G.[24]
Lopez F.
6-16-3
Raonic M.[12]
Marterer M.
W/O
Cecchinato M.[14]
Dzumhur D.
W/O
Tiafoe F.[28]
Kecmanovic M.
7-667-65
Medvedev D.[13]
Mannarino A.
6-26-1
Fognini F.[15]
Andreozzi G.
5-76-46-4
Krajinovic F.
Wawrinka S.[30]
5-76-27-65
Chardy J.
Simon G.[23]
6-46-2
Goffin D.[18]
Andujar P.
6-46-1
Auger Aliassime F.
Fucsovics M.[29]
6-44-66-0
Coric B.[11]
Carballes Baena R.
7-670-66-2
R128
Tomic B.
Monteiro T.
6-46-1
Marterer M.
Fritz T.
6-43-66-3
Ramos A.
Copil M.
6-46-2
Sonego L.
Klizan M.
6-46-3
Hurkacz H.
Berrettini M.
6-46-3
Auger Aliassime F.
Ruud C.
3-66-16-2
Haase R.
Lacko L.
6-26-4
Carballes Baena R.
Kudla D.
6-16-2
Lajovic D.
Cuevas P.
6-46-766-3
Sousa J.
Tseng C.
6-47-5
Thompson J.
Norrie C.
4-67-656-3
Opelka R.
Struff J.
4-66-36-4
Krajinovic F.
Herbert P.
6-46-4
Mcdonald M.
Humbert U.
6-46-747-64
Mayer L.
Ymer M.
4-66-36-4
Evans D.
Jaziri M.
6-26-0
Andujar P.
Karlovic I.
7-626-4
Ferrer D.
Querrey S.
6-36-2
Mannarino A.
Bedene A.
4-66-46-2
Bublik A.
Sandgren T.
5-76-47-65
Kecmanovic M.
Gulbis E.
6-27-5
Zverev M.
Kuhn N.
4-67-52-2
Albot R.
Ebden M.
6-03-2
Chardy J.
Jarry N.
6-716-27-65
Dzumhur D.
Eubanks C.
1-66-47-65
Ivashka I.
Fabbiano T.
6-41-66-3
Rublev A.
Daniel T.
3-66-36-4
Munar J.
Gunneswaran P.
7-636-4
Tipsarevic J.
Klahn B.
6-36-3
Delbonis F.
Gojowczyk P.
6-46-2
Andreozzi G.
Kukushkin M.
7-636-4
Lopez F.
Paire B.
7-54-66-4