Lorenzo Giustino vs Max Purcell — Zhangjiagang CH Round of 16

Zhangjiagang CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Lorenzo Giustino
ITA6
Lorenzo Giustino
#196ATP
1420ELO
1426Hard ELO
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 March 2019
hard
AUS
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
Giustino L.
6-3 6-4
Purcell M.
Giustino L.
662
Purcell M.
340

Lorenzo Giustino defeated Max Purcell 6-3 6-4 in the Zhangjiagang CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Max Purcell came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Giustino L.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Purcell M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Giustino L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Giustino L.Purcell M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.2
7.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.1
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Giustino L.Purcell M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
2
59
Break points saved·Dominant
41
92
Break points won·Even
12
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
12
84
Tiebreaks·Dominant
26
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Giustino L.Purcell M.
Freshness·
51
—

Giustino L.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 120 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Polmans M.[10]
Giustino L.[6]
6-44-67-64
Semi-finals
Giustino L.[6]
Galovic V.[11]
W/O
Polmans M.[10]
Bourgue M.[15]
6-24-66-3
Quarter-finals
Polmans M.[10]
Napolitano S.[13]
6-37-5
Bourgue M.[15]
Zhang Z.[8]
6-46-2
Giustino L.[6]
Kwon S.[3]
6-36-2
Galovic V.[11]
Ignatik U.[17]
6-46-2
R16
Kwon S.[3]
Peliwo F.[14]
6-46-2
Giustino L.[6]
Purcell M.
6-36-4
Galovic V.[11]
Chung Y.
6-36-2
Zhang Z.[8]
Saville L.
6-42-66-4
Ignatik U.[17]
Harris A.
6-27-5
Napolitano S.[13]
Duckworth J.[2]
6-43-67-5
Polmans M.[10]
Rola B.[7]
6-37-65
Bourgue M.[15]
Moriya H.[4]
7-54-66-1
R32
Galovic V.[11]
Wu D.
6-16-4
Moriya H.[4]
Molcan A.
7-657-63
Zhang Z.[8]
Maamoun K.
6-07-63
Chung Y.
Sugita Y.[5]
4-67-56-2
Rola B.[7]
Zhang Z.
6-26-4
Napolitano S.[13]
Ochi M.
2-66-36-4
Harris A.
Schnur B.[1]
6-46-727-66
Ignatik U.[17]
Oliveira G.
6-36-2
Duckworth J.[2]
Xia Z.
6-06-3
Kwon S.[3]
Clezar G.
7-666-3
Polmans M.[10]
Hernandez J.
6-36-3
Bourgue M.[15]
Mukund S.
7-56-4
Saville L.
Safwat M.[12]
6-46-2
Giustino L.[6]
Nguyen D.
6-06-3
Purcell M.
Soeda G.[9]
4-67-646-1
Peliwo F.[14]
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-4
R64
Ochi M.
Gakhov I.
3-66-16-4
Purcell M.
Santillan A.
6-22-1
Hernandez J.
Li Z.
1-66-36-4
Xia Z.
Wang T.
1-67-616-3
Harris A.
He Y.
6-16-1
Wu D.
Gao X.
7-56-4
Zhang Z.
Hua R.
6-46-3
Molcan A.
Serdarusic N.
7-614-66-2
Mukund S.
Crepatte B.
6-26-1
Saville L.
Tokuda R.
7-53-66-3
Maamoun K.
Yang T.
6-46-2
Nguyen D.
Banes M.
6-46-3
Karlovskiy E.
Kim C.
6-27-5
Clezar G.
Heliovaara H.
7-616-3
Chung Y.
Sun F.
6-46-4
Oliveira G.
Wu Y.
6-22-66-2