Viktor Galovic vs Uladzimir Ignatik — Zhangjiagang CH Quarter-final

Zhangjiagang CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ITA11
Viktor Galovic
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 March 2019
hard
BLR17
Uladzimir Ignatik
#1413ATP
36 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
Galovic V.
6-4 6-2
Ignatik U.
Galovic V.
662
Ignatik U.
420

Viktor Galovic defeated Uladzimir Ignatik 6-4 6-2 in the Zhangjiagang CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Uladzimir Ignatik came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Galovic V.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ignatik U.

Ignatik U.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Galovic V.

Serve advantage — Ignatik U.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Galovic V.Ignatik U.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.5
6.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (101 vs 87). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Galovic V.Ignatik U.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
25
0
Break points saved·Dominant
88
53
Break points won·Even
3
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
35
2
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
24
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Polmans M.[10]
Giustino L.[6]
6-44-67-64
Semi-finals
Giustino L.[6]
Galovic V.[11]
W/O
Polmans M.[10]
Bourgue M.[15]
6-24-66-3
Quarter-finals
Polmans M.[10]
Napolitano S.[13]
6-37-5
Bourgue M.[15]
Zhang Z.[8]
6-46-2
Giustino L.[6]
Kwon S.[3]
6-36-2
Galovic V.[11]
Ignatik U.[17]
6-46-2
R16
Kwon S.[3]
Peliwo F.[14]
6-46-2
Giustino L.[6]
Purcell M.
6-36-4
Galovic V.[11]
Chung Y.
6-36-2
Zhang Z.[8]
Saville L.
6-42-66-4
Ignatik U.[17]
Harris A.
6-27-5
Napolitano S.[13]
Duckworth J.[2]
6-43-67-5
Polmans M.[10]
Rola B.[7]
6-37-65
Bourgue M.[15]
Moriya H.[4]
7-54-66-1
R32
Galovic V.[11]
Wu D.
6-16-4
Moriya H.[4]
Molcan A.
7-657-63
Zhang Z.[8]
Maamoun K.
6-07-63
Chung Y.
Sugita Y.[5]
4-67-56-2
Rola B.[7]
Zhang Z.
6-26-4
Napolitano S.[13]
Ochi M.
2-66-36-4
Harris A.
Schnur B.[1]
6-46-727-66
Ignatik U.[17]
Oliveira G.
6-36-2
Duckworth J.[2]
Xia Z.
6-06-3
Kwon S.[3]
Clezar G.
7-666-3
Polmans M.[10]
Hernandez J.
6-36-3
Bourgue M.[15]
Mukund S.
7-56-4
Saville L.
Safwat M.[12]
6-46-2
Giustino L.[6]
Nguyen D.
6-06-3
Purcell M.
Soeda G.[9]
4-67-646-1
Peliwo F.[14]
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-4
R64
Ochi M.
Gakhov I.
3-66-16-4
Purcell M.
Santillan A.
6-22-1
Hernandez J.
Li Z.
1-66-36-4
Xia Z.
Wang T.
1-67-616-3
Harris A.
He Y.
6-16-1
Wu D.
Gao X.
7-56-4
Zhang Z.
Hua R.
6-46-3
Molcan A.
Serdarusic N.
7-614-66-2
Mukund S.
Crepatte B.
6-26-1
Saville L.
Tokuda R.
7-53-66-3
Maamoun K.
Yang T.
6-46-2
Nguyen D.
Banes M.
6-46-3
Karlovskiy E.
Kim C.
6-27-5
Clezar G.
Heliovaara H.
7-616-3
Chung Y.
Sun F.
6-46-4
Oliveira G.
Wu Y.
6-22-66-2