Jan Choinski vs Yannick Hanfmann — Lille CH Round of 32

Lille CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jan Choinski
GBR
Jan Choinski
#75ATP
1686ELO
1571Hard ELO
$204kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 March 2019
hard
Yannick Hanfmann
GER11
Yannick Hanfmann
#51ATP
1781ELO
1721Hard ELO
$596kYTD
$4.5MCAREER
34 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLL
Choinski J.
6-0 6-4
Hanfmann Y.
Choinski J.
662
Hanfmann Y.
040

Jan Choinski defeated Yannick Hanfmann 6-0 6-4 in the Lille CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Yannick Hanfmann came in ranked #51.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Choinski J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Hanfmann Y.

Hanfmann Y.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Choinski J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Choinski J.Hanfmann Y.
—
Serve
58
—
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Choinski J.Hanfmann Y.
1st serve in·Even
65%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
54%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.0
5.5
Double faults / match·Even
1.6
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Choinski J.Hanfmann Y.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
55
61
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
95
Break points won·Slight edge
20
26
Deciding sets·Slight edge
88
94
Tiebreaks·Even
41
42

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Choinski J.Hanfmann Y.
Freshness·Dominant
55
93

Choinski J.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 113 games (7d) · Hanfmann Y.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Barrere G.[3]
Maden Y.[2]
6-24-66-4
Semi-finals
Maden Y.[2]
Halys Q.[13]
7-651-66-3
Barrere G.[3]
Ofner S.[15]
6-47-65
Quarter-finals
Maden Y.[2]
Choinski J.
6-36-3
Halys Q.[13]
Kamke T.
7-626-2
Barrere G.[3]
Karatsev A.
6-36-4
Ofner S.[15]
Gombos N.
6-37-5
R16
Halys Q.[13]
Bachinger M.[4]
5-77-56-3
Maden Y.[2]
De Greef A.[16]
6-36-4
Choinski J.
Roumane R.
4-66-47-64
Kamke T.
Tatlot J.
6-26-4
Karatsev A.
Vatutin A.
7-56-1
Barrere G.[3]
Troicki V.
3-66-36-2
Gombos N.
Torpegaard M.
6-36-0
Ofner S.[15]
Pavlasek A.
6-36-2
R32
Kamke T.
Travaglia S.[6]
6-30-0
Ofner S.[15]
Zapata Miralles B.
7-616-757-62
Maden Y.[2]
Brown D.
6-46-2
De Greef A.[16]
Viola M.
6-36-1
Choinski J.
Hanfmann Y.[11]
6-06-4
Roumane R.
Hoang A.[8]
7-646-3
Bachinger M.[4]
Bonadio R.
6-16-2
Halys Q.[13]
Miedler L.
6-46-1
Tatlot J.
Novak D.[10]
6-46-2
Karatsev A.
Stakhovsky S.[5]
6-36-4
Vatutin A.
Basic M.[12]
6-36-2
Troicki V.
Brands D.[14]
6-16-3
Barrere G.[3]
Mertens Y.
6-46-1
Gombos N.
Moutet C.[7]
7-53-67-5
Torpegaard M.
Otte O.[9]
6-36-736-3
Pavlasek A.
Garcia Lopez G.[1]
7-57-66
R64
Kamke T.
Benchetrit E.
6-13-0
Pavlasek A.
De Schepper K.
7-662-66-1
Tatlot J.
Blancaneaux G.
6-30-0
Choinski J.
Horansky F.
6-46-4
Brown D.
Janvier M.
6-46-4
Viola M.
Bonzi B.
4-67-56-3
Roumane R.
Ilkel C.
6-36-2
Bonadio R.
Balazs A.
6-26-2
Miedler L.
Griekspoor T.
7-656-4
Karatsev A.
Safiullin R.
6-36-3
Vatutin A.
Mahut N.
7-666-4
Troicki V.
Jacq G.
7-6106-2
Mertens Y.
Furness E.
6-07-63
Gombos N.
Artunedo Martinavarro A.
4-66-46-4
Torpegaard M.
Masur D.
1-66-36-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-16-3