Matteo Viola vs Benjamin Bonzi — Lille CH Round of 64

Lille CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
ITA
Matteo Viola
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 18 March 2019
hard
Benjamin Bonzi
FRA
Benjamin Bonzi
#102ATP
1749ELO
1713Hard ELO
$396kYTD
$4.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWWL
Viola M.
4-6 7-5 6-3
Bonzi B.
Viola M.
4762
Bonzi B.
6531

Matteo Viola defeated Benjamin Bonzi 4-6 7-5 6-3 in the Lille CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Viola M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Bonzi B.

Bonzi B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Viola M.

Serve advantage — Bonzi B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Viola M.Bonzi B.
—
Serve
27
—
Return
32

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Viola M.Bonzi B.
1st serve in·Even
67%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.3
5.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (151 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Viola M.Bonzi B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
8
65
Break points saved·Dominant
20
96
Break points won·Even
25
27
Deciding sets·Dominant
15
77
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
70
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Viola M.Bonzi B.
Freshness·
—
96

Bonzi B.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Barrere G.[3]
Maden Y.[2]
6-24-66-4
Semi-finals
Maden Y.[2]
Halys Q.[13]
7-651-66-3
Barrere G.[3]
Ofner S.[15]
6-47-65
Quarter-finals
Maden Y.[2]
Choinski J.
6-36-3
Halys Q.[13]
Kamke T.
7-626-2
Barrere G.[3]
Karatsev A.
6-36-4
Ofner S.[15]
Gombos N.
6-37-5
R16
Halys Q.[13]
Bachinger M.[4]
5-77-56-3
Maden Y.[2]
De Greef A.[16]
6-36-4
Choinski J.
Roumane R.
4-66-47-64
Kamke T.
Tatlot J.
6-26-4
Karatsev A.
Vatutin A.
7-56-1
Barrere G.[3]
Troicki V.
3-66-36-2
Gombos N.
Torpegaard M.
6-36-0
Ofner S.[15]
Pavlasek A.
6-36-2
R32
Kamke T.
Travaglia S.[6]
6-30-0
Ofner S.[15]
Zapata Miralles B.
7-616-757-62
Maden Y.[2]
Brown D.
6-46-2
De Greef A.[16]
Viola M.
6-36-1
Choinski J.
Hanfmann Y.[11]
6-06-4
Roumane R.
Hoang A.[8]
7-646-3
Bachinger M.[4]
Bonadio R.
6-16-2
Halys Q.[13]
Miedler L.
6-46-1
Tatlot J.
Novak D.[10]
6-46-2
Karatsev A.
Stakhovsky S.[5]
6-36-4
Vatutin A.
Basic M.[12]
6-36-2
Troicki V.
Brands D.[14]
6-16-3
Barrere G.[3]
Mertens Y.
6-46-1
Gombos N.
Moutet C.[7]
7-53-67-5
Torpegaard M.
Otte O.[9]
6-36-736-3
Pavlasek A.
Garcia Lopez G.[1]
7-57-66
R64
Kamke T.
Benchetrit E.
6-13-0
Pavlasek A.
De Schepper K.
7-662-66-1
Tatlot J.
Blancaneaux G.
6-30-0
Choinski J.
Horansky F.
6-46-4
Brown D.
Janvier M.
6-46-4
Viola M.
Bonzi B.
4-67-56-3
Roumane R.
Ilkel C.
6-36-2
Bonadio R.
Balazs A.
6-26-2
Miedler L.
Griekspoor T.
7-656-4
Karatsev A.
Safiullin R.
6-36-3
Vatutin A.
Mahut N.
7-666-4
Troicki V.
Jacq G.
7-6106-2
Mertens Y.
Furness E.
6-07-63
Gombos N.
Artunedo Martinavarro A.
4-66-46-4
Torpegaard M.
Masur D.
1-66-36-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-16-3