Daniel Nguyen vs Maverick Banes — Zhangjiagang CH Round of 64

Zhangjiagang CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
USA
Daniel Nguyen
35 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 18 March 2019
hard
AUS
Maverick Banes
34 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLW
Nguyen D.
6-4 6-3
Banes M.
Nguyen D.
662
Banes M.
430

Daniel Nguyen defeated Maverick Banes 6-4 6-3 in the Zhangjiagang CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Nguyen closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nguyen D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Banes M.

Banes M.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Nguyen D.

Serve advantage — Nguyen D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nguyen D.Banes M.
1st serve in·Even
57%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
34%
Break points saved·Even
55%
52%
Aces / match·Even
3.7
3.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.0
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 40). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nguyen D.Banes M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
21
16
Break points saved·Even
37
41
Break points won·Clear edge
22
42
Deciding sets·Dominant
59
18
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Polmans M.[10]
Giustino L.[6]
6-44-67-64
Semi-finals
Giustino L.[6]
Galovic V.[11]
W/O
Polmans M.[10]
Bourgue M.[15]
6-24-66-3
Quarter-finals
Polmans M.[10]
Napolitano S.[13]
6-37-5
Bourgue M.[15]
Zhang Z.[8]
6-46-2
Giustino L.[6]
Kwon S.[3]
6-36-2
Galovic V.[11]
Ignatik U.[17]
6-46-2
R16
Kwon S.[3]
Peliwo F.[14]
6-46-2
Giustino L.[6]
Purcell M.
6-36-4
Galovic V.[11]
Chung Y.
6-36-2
Zhang Z.[8]
Saville L.
6-42-66-4
Ignatik U.[17]
Harris A.
6-27-5
Napolitano S.[13]
Duckworth J.[2]
6-43-67-5
Polmans M.[10]
Rola B.[7]
6-37-65
Bourgue M.[15]
Moriya H.[4]
7-54-66-1
R32
Galovic V.[11]
Wu D.
6-16-4
Moriya H.[4]
Molcan A.
7-657-63
Zhang Z.[8]
Maamoun K.
6-07-63
Chung Y.
Sugita Y.[5]
4-67-56-2
Rola B.[7]
Zhang Z.
6-26-4
Napolitano S.[13]
Ochi M.
2-66-36-4
Harris A.
Schnur B.[1]
6-46-727-66
Ignatik U.[17]
Oliveira G.
6-36-2
Duckworth J.[2]
Xia Z.
6-06-3
Kwon S.[3]
Clezar G.
7-666-3
Polmans M.[10]
Hernandez J.
6-36-3
Bourgue M.[15]
Mukund S.
7-56-4
Saville L.
Safwat M.[12]
6-46-2
Giustino L.[6]
Nguyen D.
6-06-3
Purcell M.
Soeda G.[9]
4-67-646-1
Peliwo F.[14]
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-4
R64
Ochi M.
Gakhov I.
3-66-16-4
Purcell M.
Santillan A.
6-22-1
Hernandez J.
Li Z.
1-66-36-4
Xia Z.
Wang T.
1-67-616-3
Harris A.
He Y.
6-16-1
Wu D.
Gao X.
7-56-4
Zhang Z.
Hua R.
6-46-3
Molcan A.
Serdarusic N.
7-614-66-2
Mukund S.
Crepatte B.
6-26-1
Saville L.
Tokuda R.
7-53-66-3
Maamoun K.
Yang T.
6-46-2
Nguyen D.
Banes M.
6-46-3
Karlovskiy E.
Kim C.
6-27-5
Clezar G.
Heliovaara H.
7-616-3
Chung Y.
Sun F.
6-46-4
Oliveira G.
Wu Y.
6-22-66-2