Casper Ruud vs Elias Ymer — Phoenix CH Round of 32

Phoenix CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Casper Ruud
NOR15
Casper Ruud
#13ATP
1983ELO
1889Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$29MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 March 2019
hard
Elias Ymer
SWE
Elias Ymer
#183ATP
1548ELO
1527Hard ELO
$191kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWW
Ruud C.
1-6 6-3 6-3
Ymer E.
Ruud C.
1662
Ymer E.
6331

Casper Ruud defeated Elias Ymer 1-6 6-3 6-3 in the Phoenix CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Casper Ruud came in ranked #13, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Casper Ruud extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-05-29Roland GarrosR128clayCasper Ruud6-4 6-3 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Ruud C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Ymer E.

Ymer E.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ruud C.

Serve advantage — Ruud C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ruud C.Ymer E.
59
Serve
—
31
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruud C.Ymer E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.7
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruud C.Ymer E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
48
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
83
Break points won·Dominant
75
23
Deciding sets·Clear edge
99
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ruud C.Ymer E.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Ruud C.: 15 days rest · Ymer E.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Berrettini M.[6]
Kukushkin M.[4]
3-67-667-62
Semi-finals
Kukushkin M.[4]
Caruso S.
6-17-5
Berrettini M.[6]
Andreozzi G.[12]
7-636-1
Quarter-finals
Berrettini M.[6]
Sonego L.
6-46-4
Andreozzi G.[12]
Millman J.[3]
6-34-66-3
Kukushkin M.[4]
Jarry N.[11]
6-47-5
Caruso S.
Goffin D.[1]
2-66-36-2
R16
Goffin D.[1]
Ruud C.[15]
7-647-64
Berrettini M.[6]
Gojowczyk P.[10]
6-37-5
Andreozzi G.[12]
Ito T.
6-23-66-4
Sonego L.
Harrison R.
6-46-2
Millman J.[3]
Majchrzak K.
6-16-2
Jarry N.[11]
Daniel T.[8]
4-66-16-4
Kukushkin M.[4]
Ivashka I.[16]
6-27-65
Caruso S.
Donskoy E.
6-36-4
R32
Ivashka I.[16]
Gerasimov E.
6-44-66-2
Jarry N.[11]
Polansky P.
6-15-76-4
Caruso S.
Kellovsky D.
4-67-626-2
Gojowczyk P.[10]
Krstin P.
6-46-4
Sonego L.
Chardy J.[2]
3-66-37-5
Harrison R.
Harris L.[14]
3-66-46-4
Berrettini M.[6]
Kovalik J.
6-16-1
Millman J.[3]
Lacko L.
6-776-47-64
Majchrzak K.
Martin F.
7-57-5
Andreozzi G.[12]
Arnaboldi A.
6-766-36-1
Ito T.
Ebden M.[5]
3-66-47-67
Daniel T.[8]
Evans D.
6-46-2
Kukushkin M.[4]
Tseng C.
7-56-3
Donskoy E.
Gulbis E.[9]
6-37-66
Ruud C.[15]
Ymer E.
1-66-36-3
Goffin D.[1]
Carballes Baena R.
6-16-4
R64
Ymer E.
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Lacko L.
Uchiyama Y.
5-76-46-2
Harrison R.
Quinzi G.
6-32-2
Kovalik J.
Istomin D.
6-32-1
Gerasimov E.
Popyrin A.
6-13-0
Carballes Baena R.
Vanni L.
6-37-66
Ito T.
Ponwith N.
6-46-4
Krstin P.
Ramanathan R.
6-26-4
Sonego L.
Kuhn N.
6-36-2
Majchrzak K.
Ymer M.
7-636-3
Arnaboldi A.
Laaksonen H.
6-16-3
Evans D.
Escobedo E.
6-46-1
Polansky P.
Nielsen F.
7-676-3
Tseng C.
Jung J.
3-66-36-2
Caruso S.
Krueger M.
6-16-2
Donskoy E.
Bemelmans R.
6-36-3