Mikhail Kukushkin vs Ilya Ivashka — Phoenix CH Round of 16

Phoenix CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ4
Mikhail Kukushkin
#316ATP
1552ELO
1526Hard ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 March 2019
hard
Ilya Ivashka
BLR16
Ilya Ivashka
#554ATP
1538ELO
1509Hard ELO
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWLWW
Kukushkin M.
6-2 7-6
Ivashka I.
Kukushkin M.
6772
Ivashka I.
2650

Mikhail Kukushkin defeated Ilya Ivashka 6-2 7-6 in the Phoenix CH round of 16 on hard. Mikhail Kukushkin claimed a first win over Ilya Ivashka in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-07-24Tokyo OlympicsR32hardIlya Ivashka6-7(4) 6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Kukushkin M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ivashka I.

Ivashka I.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kukushkin M.Ivashka I.
1st serve in·Even
66%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
5.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.1
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kukushkin M.Ivashka I.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
46
53
Break points saved·Even
93
93
Break points won·Even
41
41
Deciding sets·Dominant
41
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
44
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kukushkin M.Ivashka I.
Freshness·
—
78

Ivashka I.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Berrettini M.[6]
Kukushkin M.[4]
3-67-667-62
Semi-finals
Kukushkin M.[4]
Caruso S.
6-17-5
Berrettini M.[6]
Andreozzi G.[12]
7-636-1
Quarter-finals
Berrettini M.[6]
Sonego L.
6-46-4
Andreozzi G.[12]
Millman J.[3]
6-34-66-3
Kukushkin M.[4]
Jarry N.[11]
6-47-5
Caruso S.
Goffin D.[1]
2-66-36-2
R16
Goffin D.[1]
Ruud C.[15]
7-647-64
Berrettini M.[6]
Gojowczyk P.[10]
6-37-5
Andreozzi G.[12]
Ito T.
6-23-66-4
Sonego L.
Harrison R.
6-46-2
Millman J.[3]
Majchrzak K.
6-16-2
Jarry N.[11]
Daniel T.[8]
4-66-16-4
Kukushkin M.[4]
Ivashka I.[16]
6-27-65
Caruso S.
Donskoy E.
6-36-4
R32
Ivashka I.[16]
Gerasimov E.
6-44-66-2
Jarry N.[11]
Polansky P.
6-15-76-4
Caruso S.
Kellovsky D.
4-67-626-2
Gojowczyk P.[10]
Krstin P.
6-46-4
Sonego L.
Chardy J.[2]
3-66-37-5
Harrison R.
Harris L.[14]
3-66-46-4
Berrettini M.[6]
Kovalik J.
6-16-1
Millman J.[3]
Lacko L.
6-776-47-64
Majchrzak K.
Martin F.
7-57-5
Andreozzi G.[12]
Arnaboldi A.
6-766-36-1
Ito T.
Ebden M.[5]
3-66-47-67
Daniel T.[8]
Evans D.
6-46-2
Kukushkin M.[4]
Tseng C.
7-56-3
Donskoy E.
Gulbis E.[9]
6-37-66
Ruud C.[15]
Ymer E.
1-66-36-3
Goffin D.[1]
Carballes Baena R.
6-16-4
R64
Ymer E.
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Lacko L.
Uchiyama Y.
5-76-46-2
Harrison R.
Quinzi G.
6-32-2
Kovalik J.
Istomin D.
6-32-1
Gerasimov E.
Popyrin A.
6-13-0
Carballes Baena R.
Vanni L.
6-37-66
Ito T.
Ponwith N.
6-46-4
Krstin P.
Ramanathan R.
6-26-4
Sonego L.
Kuhn N.
6-36-2
Majchrzak K.
Ymer M.
7-636-3
Arnaboldi A.
Laaksonen H.
6-16-3
Evans D.
Escobedo E.
6-46-1
Polansky P.
Nielsen F.
7-676-3
Tseng C.
Jung J.
3-66-36-2
Caruso S.
Krueger M.
6-16-2
Donskoy E.
Bemelmans R.
6-36-3