Salvatore Caruso vs Mitchell Krueger — Phoenix CH Round of 64

Phoenix CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
ITA
Salvatore Caruso
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 March 2019
hard
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
Caruso S.
6-1 6-2
Krueger M.
Caruso S.
662
Krueger M.
120

Salvatore Caruso defeated Mitchell Krueger 6-1 6-2 in the Phoenix CH round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Salvatore Caruso came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Salvatore Caruso extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-06-27WimbledonQ2grassSalvatore Caruso7-6(2) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Caruso S.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Krueger M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Caruso S.

Serve advantage — Krueger M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Caruso S.Krueger M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Caruso S.Krueger M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
41
16
Break points saved·Clear edge
65
87
Break points won·Clear edge
30
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
13
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
18
0

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Caruso S.Krueger M.
Freshness·
—
87

Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Berrettini M.[6]
Kukushkin M.[4]
3-67-667-62
Semi-finals
Kukushkin M.[4]
Caruso S.
6-17-5
Berrettini M.[6]
Andreozzi G.[12]
7-636-1
Quarter-finals
Berrettini M.[6]
Sonego L.
6-46-4
Andreozzi G.[12]
Millman J.[3]
6-34-66-3
Kukushkin M.[4]
Jarry N.[11]
6-47-5
Caruso S.
Goffin D.[1]
2-66-36-2
R16
Goffin D.[1]
Ruud C.[15]
7-647-64
Berrettini M.[6]
Gojowczyk P.[10]
6-37-5
Andreozzi G.[12]
Ito T.
6-23-66-4
Sonego L.
Harrison R.
6-46-2
Millman J.[3]
Majchrzak K.
6-16-2
Jarry N.[11]
Daniel T.[8]
4-66-16-4
Kukushkin M.[4]
Ivashka I.[16]
6-27-65
Caruso S.
Donskoy E.
6-36-4
R32
Ivashka I.[16]
Gerasimov E.
6-44-66-2
Jarry N.[11]
Polansky P.
6-15-76-4
Caruso S.
Kellovsky D.
4-67-626-2
Gojowczyk P.[10]
Krstin P.
6-46-4
Sonego L.
Chardy J.[2]
3-66-37-5
Harrison R.
Harris L.[14]
3-66-46-4
Berrettini M.[6]
Kovalik J.
6-16-1
Millman J.[3]
Lacko L.
6-776-47-64
Majchrzak K.
Martin F.
7-57-5
Andreozzi G.[12]
Arnaboldi A.
6-766-36-1
Ito T.
Ebden M.[5]
3-66-47-67
Daniel T.[8]
Evans D.
6-46-2
Kukushkin M.[4]
Tseng C.
7-56-3
Donskoy E.
Gulbis E.[9]
6-37-66
Ruud C.[15]
Ymer E.
1-66-36-3
Goffin D.[1]
Carballes Baena R.
6-16-4
R64
Ymer E.
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Lacko L.
Uchiyama Y.
5-76-46-2
Harrison R.
Quinzi G.
6-32-2
Kovalik J.
Istomin D.
6-32-1
Gerasimov E.
Popyrin A.
6-13-0
Carballes Baena R.
Vanni L.
6-37-66
Ito T.
Ponwith N.
6-46-4
Krstin P.
Ramanathan R.
6-26-4
Sonego L.
Kuhn N.
6-36-2
Majchrzak K.
Ymer M.
7-636-3
Arnaboldi A.
Laaksonen H.
6-16-3
Evans D.
Escobedo E.
6-46-1
Polansky P.
Nielsen F.
7-676-3
Tseng C.
Jung J.
3-66-36-2
Caruso S.
Krueger M.
6-16-2
Donskoy E.
Bemelmans R.
6-36-3