Felix Auger Aliassime vs Cameron Norrie — Indian Wells Masters Round of 128

Indian Wells Masters · ATP · Round of 128
Felix Auger Aliassime
CAN
Felix Auger Aliassime
#4ATP
1958ELO
1932Hard ELO
$2.1MYTD
$23MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 March 2019
hard
Cameron Norrie
GBR
Cameron Norrie
#38ATP
1829ELO
1789Hard ELO
$963kYTD
$15MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Auger Aliassime F.
6-3 6-2
Norrie C.
Auger Aliassime F.
662
Norrie C.
320

Felix Auger Aliassime defeated Cameron Norrie 6-3 6-2 in the Indian Wells Masters round of 128 on hard. The result followed the form book — Felix Auger Aliassime came in ranked #4, leading the head-to-head 4–1, defending last year's round of 64. Felix Auger Aliassime extended the head-to-head to 5–1.

Key context

Head to head

4–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-08-08Canada MastersR16hardFelix Auger Aliassime6-3 6-4
2022-08-01Los CabosSFhardCameron Norrie6-4 3-6 6-3
2022-02-07RotterdamQFhardFelix Auger Aliassime7-5 7-6(4)
2022-01-03Atp CupRRhardFelix Auger Aliassime7-6(4) 6-3
2021-10-25ViennaR16hardFelix Auger Aliassime2-6 7-6(6) 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Auger Aliassime F.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Norrie C.

Norrie C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Auger Aliassime F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Auger Aliassime F.Norrie C.
74
Serve
45
44
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Auger Aliassime F.Norrie C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
68%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.4
5.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Auger Aliassime F.Norrie C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
84
90
Break points saved·Even
100
99
Break points won·Dominant
50
83
Deciding sets·Even
99
98
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
99
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Auger Aliassime F.Norrie C.
Freshness·Dominant
70
100

Auger Aliassime F.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 57 games (7d) · Norrie C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
21°COvercast
Wind 6 km/hHumidity 32%
Final
Thiem D.[7]
Federer R.[4]
3-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Thiem D.[7]
Raonic M.[13]
7-636-736-4
Federer R.[4]
Nadal R.[2]
W/O
Quarter-finals
Raonic M.[13]
Kecmanovic M.
6-36-4
Federer R.[4]
Hurkacz H.
6-46-4
Thiem D.[7]
Monfils G.[18]
W/O
Nadal R.[2]
Khachanov K.[12]
7-627-62
R16
Monfils G.[18]
Kohlschreiber P.
6-06-2
Thiem D.[7]
Karlovic I.
6-46-3
Raonic M.[13]
Struff J.
6-46-3
Hurkacz H.
Shapovalov D.[24]
7-632-66-3
Federer R.[4]
Edmund K.[22]
6-16-4
Khachanov K.[12]
Isner J.[8]
6-47-61
Nadal R.[2]
Krajinovic F.
6-36-4
Kecmanovic M.
Nishioka Y.
6-40-0
R32
Federer R.[4]
Wawrinka S.
6-36-4
Monfils G.[18]
Ramos A.
6-06-3
Karlovic I.
Gunneswaran P.
6-37-63
Struff J.
Zverev A.[3]
6-36-1
Raonic M.[13]
Giron M.
4-66-46-4
Nishioka Y.
Auger Aliassime F.
6-726-47-65
Kecmanovic M.
Djere L.[30]
6-27-63
Shapovalov D.[24]
Cilic M.[10]
6-46-2
Edmund K.[22]
Albot R.
6-36-3
Isner J.[8]
Pella G.[32]
6-36-4
Khachanov K.[12]
Rublev A.
7-56-3
Krajinovic F.
Medvedev D.[14]
6-36-2
Nadal R.[2]
Schwartzman D.[25]
6-36-1
Hurkacz H.
Nishikori K.[6]
4-66-46-3
Kohlschreiber P.
Djokovic N.[1]
6-46-4
Thiem D.[7]
Simon G.[27]
6-36-1
R64
Simon G.[27]
Jaziri M.
6-36-766-4
Djokovic N.[1]
Fratangelo B.
7-656-2
Kohlschreiber P.
Kyrgios N.[31]
6-46-4
Monfils G.[18]
Mayer L.
6-43-66-3
Ramos A.
Cecchinato M.[15]
6-46-2
Karlovic I.
Coric B.[11]
6-47-62
Gunneswaran P.
Basilashvili N.[17]
6-46-767-64
Thiem D.[7]
Thompson J.
6-47-5
Struff J.
Berankis R.
3-66-36-2
Giron M.
De Minaur A.[23]
1-66-46-2
Raonic M.[13]
Querrey S.
7-616-4
Auger Aliassime F.
Tsitsipas S.[9]
6-46-2
Nishioka Y.
Bautista Agut R.[21]
7-636-4
Djere L.[30]
Andreozzi G.
6-36-4
Kecmanovic M.
Marterer M.
6-36-2
Nishikori K.[6]
Mannarino A.
6-44-67-64
Shapovalov D.[24]
Johnson S.
6-36-4
Albot R.
Fognini F.[16]
6-07-64
Edmund K.[22]
Jarry N.
6-26-0
Wawrinka S.
Fucsovics M.[29]
6-46-757-5
Isner J.[8]
Popyrin A.
6-06-2
Pella G.[32]
Bolt A.
7-652-66-3
Rublev A.
Haase R.
6-33-66-3
Khachanov K.[12]
Lopez F.
6-31-66-4
Medvedev D.[14]
Mcdonald M.
7-56-0
Schwartzman D.[25]
Carballes Baena R.
6-36-1
Zverev A.[3]
Klizan M.
6-32-0
Cilic M.[10]
Lajovic D.
6-36-4
Krajinovic F.
Goffin D.[20]
6-36-3
Hurkacz H.
Pouille L.[28]
6-23-66-4
Nadal R.[2]
Donaldson J.
6-16-1
Federer R.[4]
Gojowczyk P.
6-17-5
R128
Lopez F.
Berdych T.
7-637-62
Andreozzi G.
Ivashka I.
7-636-4
Giron M.
Chardy J.
7-637-61
Fratangelo B.
Ymer E.
4-66-26-2
Kohlschreiber P.
Herbert P.
6-46-0
Thompson J.
Delbonis F.
6-46-767-65
Struff J.
Millman J.
6-16-3
Querrey S.
Berrettini M.
7-652-66-4
Auger Aliassime F.
Norrie C.
6-36-2
Nishioka Y.
Kudla D.
3-66-36-2
Marterer M.
Humbert U.
6-46-2
Mannarino A.
Sandgren T.
6-26-756-1
Hurkacz H.
Young D.
6-36-3
Johnson S.
Fritz T.
6-36-3
Lajovic D.
Daniel T.
7-666-4
Jarry N.
Tiafoe F.
6-44-67-5
Wawrinka S.
Evans D.
6-746-36-3
Gojowczyk P.
Seppi A.
7-56-4
Popyrin A.
Munar J.
7-676-3
Bolt A.
Gulbis E.
6-35-76-2
Haase R.
Istomin D.
7-626-1
Krajinovic F.
Kukushkin M.
6-36-4
Gunneswaran P.
Paire B.
7-656-4
Donaldson J.
Ito T.
6-37-5
Mayer L.
Opelka R.
7-667-62
Karlovic I.
Ebden M.
7-637-63
Ramos A.
Dzumhur D.
6-16-2
Jaziri M.
Klahn B.
6-46-2
Carballes Baena R.
Harrison R.
6-37-5
Klizan M.
Zverev M.
6-16-4
Albot R.
Copil M.
6-26-2
Mcdonald M.
Sousa J.
6-43-66-3