Andrey Rublev vs Peter Polansky — Indian Wells CH Round of 16

Indian Wells CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Andrey Rublev
RUS7
Andrey Rublev
#16ATP
1902ELO
1849Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 February 2019
hard
CAN11
Peter Polansky
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Rublev A.
6-2 7-5
Polansky P.
Rublev A.
672
Polansky P.
250

Andrey Rublev defeated Peter Polansky 6-2 7-5 in the Indian Wells CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Andrey Rublev came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Andrey Rublev extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Andrey Rublev closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–5.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-01-16Australian OpenQ3hardAndrey Rublev6-4 4-6 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Rublev A.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Polansky P.

Polansky P.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Serve advantage — Rublev A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Rublev A.Polansky P.
55
Serve
—
49
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rublev A.Polansky P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
55%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Even
66%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.9
5.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 127). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rublev A.Polansky P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
18
Break points saved·Clear edge
100
82
Break points won·Dominant
72
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
97
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
92
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Rublev A.Polansky P.
Freshness·
100
—

Rublev A.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Edmund K.[1]
Rublev A.[7]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Edmund K.[1]
Harris L.[5]
6-24-66-1
Rublev A.[7]
Evans D.
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Edmund K.[1]
Maden Y.[8]
3-66-06-3
Evans D.
Jung J.[14]
6-46-4
Rublev A.[7]
Bolt A.[13]
6-46-3
Harris L.[5]
Caruso S.
7-646-3
R16
Evans D.
Giraldo S.
6-16-2
Harris L.[5]
Young D.
6-46-2
Maden Y.[8]
Majchrzak K.
6-27-5
Jung J.[14]
Krajinovic F.[2]
7-56-3
Bolt A.[13]
Donskoy E.[4]
6-33-67-5
Rublev A.[7]
Polansky P.[11]
6-27-5
Caruso S.
Redlicki M.
7-682-67-61
Edmund K.[1]
Rosol L.[16]
6-36-4
R32
Giraldo S.
Donaldson J.[9]
6-22-66-4
Rosol L.[16]
Watanuki Y.
7-657-66
Edmund K.[1]
Robredo T.
6-46-4
Redlicki M.
Blanch U.
6-33-66-1
Krajinovic F.[2]
Aragone J.
6-23-67-5
Jung J.[14]
Krueger M.
6-16-4
Evans D.
Istomin D.[6]
6-46-4
Donskoy E.[4]
Zopp J.
6-37-63
Bolt A.[13]
Krstin P.
6-36-4
Polansky P.[11]
Harrison C.
6-43-67-64
Rublev A.[7]
Smith J.
6-27-5
Harris L.[5]
Eubanks C.
7-656-746-0
Young D.
Laaksonen H.[10]
7-53-66-4
Caruso S.
Lacko L.[15]
4-66-36-1
Maden Y.[8]
Escobedo E.
7-636-3
Majchrzak K.
Kecmanovic M.[12]
6-26-3
R64
Krueger M.
Milojevic N.
7-56-4
Giraldo S.
Novikov D.
7-55-76-2
Evans D.
Cressy M.
6-47-5
Zopp J.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-2
Eubanks C.
Giron M.
7-56-3
Aragone J.
Nakashima B.
6-16-4
Krstin P.
Bemelmans R.
6-36-4
Harrison C.
Smyczek T.
6-44-66-3
Smith J.
Rubin N.
6-726-36-4
Young D.
Kwiatkowski T.
4-66-17-64
Caruso S.
Quiroz R.
7-56-2
Blanch U.
Brooksby J.
4-66-26-2
Escobedo E.
Redlicki M.
6-37-63
Majchrzak K.
King D.
6-46-3
Watanuki Y.
Khan Z.
3-66-26-2
Robredo T.
Koepfer D.
4-67-56-2