Chun Hsin Tseng vs Skander Mansouri — Yokohama CH Round of 64

Yokohama CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1495Hard ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 February 2019
hard
TUN
Skander Mansouri
#1250ATP
30 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Tseng C.
6-4 3-6 6-3
Mansouri S.
Tseng C.
6362
Mansouri S.
4631

Chun Hsin Tseng defeated Skander Mansouri 6-4 3-6 6-3 in the Yokohama CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Chun Hsin Tseng closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tseng C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Mansouri S.

Mansouri S.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Serve advantage — Tseng C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tseng C.Mansouri S.
1st serve in·Even
58%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
45%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.0
7.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
5.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 116). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tseng C.Mansouri S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
2
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
62
Break points won·Slight edge
15
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
31
6
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kwon S.[11]
Otte O.[2]
7-646-3
Semi-finals
Otte O.[2]
Harris A.
6-36-4
Kwon S.[11]
Sugita Y.[3]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Otte O.[2]
Mager G.[10]
6-26-4
Sugita Y.[3]
Sela D.[8]
2-66-47-5
Harris A.
Yang T.
7-57-64
Kwon S.[11]
Lee D.
6-16-0
R16
Otte O.[2]
Purcell M.
1-67-56-4
Yang T.
Rodionov J.[6]
6-46-4
Mager G.[10]
Soeda G.[7]
3-67-57-5
Harris A.
Elias G.
6-45-76-4
Sela D.[8]
Rola B.[9]
6-36-1
Kwon S.[11]
Moraing M.[5]
6-26-4
Lee D.
Ito T.[1]
6-34-67-67
Sugita Y.[3]
Peliwo F.[14]
6-46-2
R32
Mager G.[10]
Tseng C.
7-637-65
Purcell M.
Troicki V.[15]
7-57-65
Rola B.[9]
Uchida K.
7-636-4
Elias G.
Clezar G.[13]
0-66-27-64
Yang T.
Cachin P.[12]
6-46-4
Ito T.[1]
Echargui M.
6-07-5
Moraing M.[5]
Wang T.
7-686-2
Rodionov J.[6]
Perez Sanz D.
7-670-66-4
Otte O.[2]
Bai Y.
6-36-2
Soeda G.[7]
Kim C.
6-16-4
Harris A.
Moriya H.[4]
6-36-3
Sela D.[8]
Saville L.
6-26-0
Peliwo F.[14]
Gakhov I.
6-26-4
Kwon S.[11]
Imamura M.
6-26-2
Sugita Y.[3]
Nguyen D.
2-66-47-5
Lee D.
Couacaud E.[16]
6-06-2
R64
Elias G.
Wu D.
6-43-66-2
Saville L.
Uesugi K.
2-66-46-2
Tseng C.
Mansouri S.
6-43-66-3
Wang T.
Hazawa S.
7-626-4
Perez Sanz D.
Imai S.
6-26-3
Yang T.
Chung Y.
6-46-3
Lee D.
Xia Z.
6-06-3
Uchida K.
Smith R.
6-36-3
Gakhov I.
Oliveira G.
6-37-65
Nguyen D.
Ellis B.
3-67-57-5
Imamura M.
Tokuda R.
7-56-2
Echargui M.
Takahashi Y.
7-55-76-2
Kim C.
Kai N.
6-16-3
Bai Y.
Ochi M.
6-20-67-5
Purcell M.
King K.
6-26-2