Roman Safiullin vs Nicola Kuhn — Pau CH Round of 16

Pau CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Roman Safiullin
RUS
Roman Safiullin
#96ATP
1750ELO
1704Hard ELO
$199kYTD
$4.3MCAREER
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 February 2019
hard
GER
Nicola Kuhn
#1540ATP
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Safiullin R.
6-3 6-4
Kuhn N.
Safiullin R.
662
Kuhn N.
340

Roman Safiullin defeated Nicola Kuhn 6-3 6-4 in the Pau CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Roman Safiullin came in ranked #96.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Safiullin R.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kuhn N.

Kuhn N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Safiullin R.

Serve advantage — Safiullin R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Safiullin R.Kuhn N.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.4
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 165). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Safiullin R.Kuhn N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
68
14
Break points saved·Dominant
96
56
Break points won·Dominant
44
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
76
10
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
78
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Safiullin R.Kuhn N.
Freshness·
78
—

Safiullin R.: 8 days rest · 4 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bublik A.[4]
Gombos N.
5-76-36-3
Semi-finals
Gombos N.
Darcis S.
6-42-0
Bublik A.[4]
Barrere G.[1]
7-667-5
Quarter-finals
Barrere G.[1]
Safiullin R.
6-16-2
Darcis S.
Halys Q.[5]
6-46-4
Gombos N.
Ofner S.[7]
6-37-65
Bublik A.[4]
Janvier M.
6-17-5
R16
Halys Q.[5]
Kamke T.[12]
7-657-63
Bublik A.[4]
Choinski J.
6-46-2
Darcis S.
Bourgue M.
3-67-57-65
Gombos N.
Kolar Z.
6-757-646-3
Ofner S.[7]
Lamasine T.
6-746-37-5
Janvier M.
Miedler L.
7-626-4
Safiullin R.
Kuhn N.
6-36-4
Barrere G.[1]
Ymer M.[13]
6-36-3
R32
Kuhn N.
Brands D.[6]
6-17-65
Janvier M.
Clarke J.[11]
6-22-0
Safiullin R.
Horansky F.[9]
7-657-63
Ymer M.[13]
Torpegaard M.
1-66-26-4
Bourgue M.
Bolelli S.[2]
7-57-65
Kolar Z.
Griekspoor T.[16]
6-727-56-3
Halys Q.[5]
Vavassori A.
6-36-2
Bublik A.[4]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-46-4
Darcis S.
De Greef A.[14]
7-657-5
Kamke T.[12]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-26-3
Gombos N.
Stakhovsky S.[3]
7-644-66-1
Lamasine T.
Napolitano S.[10]
6-17-5
Ofner S.[7]
Grigelis L.
7-656-4
Miedler L.
Giustino L.[8]
4-67-686-4
Choinski J.
Pavlasek A.[15]
6-47-5
Barrere G.[1]
Serdarusic N.
7-54-66-3
R64
Darcis S.
Muller A.
6-17-63
Vavassori A.
Bonzi B.
6-37-5
Choinski J.
Gutierrez Ferrol S.
7-52-66-3
Kolar Z.
Jacq G.
6-46-4
Kuhn N.
Brancaccio R.
6-34-66-1
Bourgue M.
Masur D.
6-16-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Heller P.
6-36-3
Gombos N.
Mitjana L.
6-46-1
Lamasine T.
Furness E.
6-27-5
Grigelis L.
Taberner C.
6-44-66-3
Miedler L.
Ilkel C.
6-46-3
Janvier M.
Karlovskiy E.
7-626-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Benchetrit E.
6-12-66-3
Safiullin R.
Brown D.
3-67-646-2
Torpegaard M.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-36-3
Serdarusic N.
Viola M.
6-36-4