Jason Jung vs Mitchell Krueger — Indian Wells CH Round of 32

Indian Wells CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jason Jung
TPE14
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 February 2019
hard
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
Jung J.
6-1 6-4
Krueger M.
Jung J.
662
Krueger M.
140

Jason Jung defeated Mitchell Krueger 6-1 6-4 in the Indian Wells CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Mitchell Krueger came in ranked #364, defending last year's round of 16. Jason Jung extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-02-10New YorkQ2hardJason Jung6-2 6-4
2017-06-12s HertogenboschQ1grassJason Jung6-1 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Jung J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Krueger M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jung J.Krueger M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.8
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jung J.Krueger M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
21
16
Break points saved·Clear edge
64
87
Break points won·Slight edge
8
14
Deciding sets·Slight edge
21
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
0

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Jung J.Krueger M.
Freshness·Slight edge
78
87

Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d) · Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Edmund K.[1]
Rublev A.[7]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Edmund K.[1]
Harris L.[5]
6-24-66-1
Rublev A.[7]
Evans D.
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Edmund K.[1]
Maden Y.[8]
3-66-06-3
Evans D.
Jung J.[14]
6-46-4
Rublev A.[7]
Bolt A.[13]
6-46-3
Harris L.[5]
Caruso S.
7-646-3
R16
Evans D.
Giraldo S.
6-16-2
Harris L.[5]
Young D.
6-46-2
Maden Y.[8]
Majchrzak K.
6-27-5
Jung J.[14]
Krajinovic F.[2]
7-56-3
Bolt A.[13]
Donskoy E.[4]
6-33-67-5
Rublev A.[7]
Polansky P.[11]
6-27-5
Caruso S.
Redlicki M.
7-682-67-61
Edmund K.[1]
Rosol L.[16]
6-36-4
R32
Giraldo S.
Donaldson J.[9]
6-22-66-4
Rosol L.[16]
Watanuki Y.
7-657-66
Edmund K.[1]
Robredo T.
6-46-4
Redlicki M.
Blanch U.
6-33-66-1
Krajinovic F.[2]
Aragone J.
6-23-67-5
Jung J.[14]
Krueger M.
6-16-4
Evans D.
Istomin D.[6]
6-46-4
Donskoy E.[4]
Zopp J.
6-37-63
Bolt A.[13]
Krstin P.
6-36-4
Polansky P.[11]
Harrison C.
6-43-67-64
Rublev A.[7]
Smith J.
6-27-5
Harris L.[5]
Eubanks C.
7-656-746-0
Young D.
Laaksonen H.[10]
7-53-66-4
Caruso S.
Lacko L.[15]
4-66-36-1
Maden Y.[8]
Escobedo E.
7-636-3
Majchrzak K.
Kecmanovic M.[12]
6-26-3
R64
Krueger M.
Milojevic N.
7-56-4
Giraldo S.
Novikov D.
7-55-76-2
Evans D.
Cressy M.
6-47-5
Zopp J.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-2
Eubanks C.
Giron M.
7-56-3
Aragone J.
Nakashima B.
6-16-4
Krstin P.
Bemelmans R.
6-36-4
Harrison C.
Smyczek T.
6-44-66-3
Smith J.
Rubin N.
6-726-36-4
Young D.
Kwiatkowski T.
4-66-17-64
Caruso S.
Quiroz R.
7-56-2
Blanch U.
Brooksby J.
4-66-26-2
Escobedo E.
Redlicki M.
6-37-63
Majchrzak K.
King D.
6-46-3
Watanuki Y.
Khan Z.
3-66-26-2
Robredo T.
Koepfer D.
4-67-56-2