Roman Safiullin vs Filip Horansky — Pau CH Round of 32

Pau CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Roman Safiullin
RUS
Roman Safiullin
#96ATP
1750ELO
1704Hard ELO
$199kYTD
$4.3MCAREER
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 February 2019
hard
SVK9
Filip Horansky
33 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
Safiullin R.
7-6 7-6
Horansky F.
Safiullin R.
77772
Horansky F.
65630

Roman Safiullin defeated Filip Horansky 7-6 7-6 in the Pau CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Safiullin R.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Horansky F.

Horansky F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Safiullin R.

Serve advantage — Safiullin R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Safiullin R.Horansky F.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.4
2.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Safiullin R.Horansky F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
68
29
Break points saved·Dominant
96
34
Break points won·Slight edge
44
33
Deciding sets·Clear edge
76
54
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
78
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Safiullin R.Horansky F.
Freshness·
78
—

Safiullin R.: 8 days rest · 4 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bublik A.[4]
Gombos N.
5-76-36-3
Semi-finals
Gombos N.
Darcis S.
6-42-0
Bublik A.[4]
Barrere G.[1]
7-667-5
Quarter-finals
Barrere G.[1]
Safiullin R.
6-16-2
Darcis S.
Halys Q.[5]
6-46-4
Gombos N.
Ofner S.[7]
6-37-65
Bublik A.[4]
Janvier M.
6-17-5
R16
Halys Q.[5]
Kamke T.[12]
7-657-63
Bublik A.[4]
Choinski J.
6-46-2
Darcis S.
Bourgue M.
3-67-57-65
Gombos N.
Kolar Z.
6-757-646-3
Ofner S.[7]
Lamasine T.
6-746-37-5
Janvier M.
Miedler L.
7-626-4
Safiullin R.
Kuhn N.
6-36-4
Barrere G.[1]
Ymer M.[13]
6-36-3
R32
Kuhn N.
Brands D.[6]
6-17-65
Janvier M.
Clarke J.[11]
6-22-0
Safiullin R.
Horansky F.[9]
7-657-63
Ymer M.[13]
Torpegaard M.
1-66-26-4
Bourgue M.
Bolelli S.[2]
7-57-65
Kolar Z.
Griekspoor T.[16]
6-727-56-3
Halys Q.[5]
Vavassori A.
6-36-2
Bublik A.[4]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-46-4
Darcis S.
De Greef A.[14]
7-657-5
Kamke T.[12]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-26-3
Gombos N.
Stakhovsky S.[3]
7-644-66-1
Lamasine T.
Napolitano S.[10]
6-17-5
Ofner S.[7]
Grigelis L.
7-656-4
Miedler L.
Giustino L.[8]
4-67-686-4
Choinski J.
Pavlasek A.[15]
6-47-5
Barrere G.[1]
Serdarusic N.
7-54-66-3
R64
Darcis S.
Muller A.
6-17-63
Vavassori A.
Bonzi B.
6-37-5
Choinski J.
Gutierrez Ferrol S.
7-52-66-3
Kolar Z.
Jacq G.
6-46-4
Kuhn N.
Brancaccio R.
6-34-66-1
Bourgue M.
Masur D.
6-16-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Heller P.
6-36-3
Gombos N.
Mitjana L.
6-46-1
Lamasine T.
Furness E.
6-27-5
Grigelis L.
Taberner C.
6-44-66-3
Miedler L.
Ilkel C.
6-46-3
Janvier M.
Karlovskiy E.
7-626-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Benchetrit E.
6-12-66-3
Safiullin R.
Brown D.
3-67-646-2
Torpegaard M.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-36-3
Serdarusic N.
Viola M.
6-36-4