Norbert Gombos vs Sergiy Stakhovsky — Pau CH Round of 32

Pau CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Norbert Gombos
SVK
Norbert Gombos
#370ATP
1472ELO
1452Hard ELO
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 February 2019
hard
UKR3
Sergiy Stakhovsky
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
Gombos N.
7-6 4-6 6-1
Stakhovsky S.
Gombos N.
77462
Stakhovsky S.
64611

Norbert Gombos defeated Sergiy Stakhovsky 7-6 4-6 6-1 in the Pau CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Norbert Gombos came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Norbert Gombos extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Norbert Gombos came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-02-19MarseilleQ2hardNorbert Gombos6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Gombos N.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Stakhovsky S.

Stakhovsky S.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gombos N.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gombos N.Stakhovsky S.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
7.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 140). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gombos N.Stakhovsky S.
Clutch Rating·Even
41
41
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
88
Break points won·Slight edge
8
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
70
57
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
36
59

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gombos N.Stakhovsky S.
Freshness·
74
—

Gombos N.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 54 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bublik A.[4]
Gombos N.
5-76-36-3
Semi-finals
Gombos N.
Darcis S.
6-42-0
Bublik A.[4]
Barrere G.[1]
7-667-5
Quarter-finals
Barrere G.[1]
Safiullin R.
6-16-2
Darcis S.
Halys Q.[5]
6-46-4
Gombos N.
Ofner S.[7]
6-37-65
Bublik A.[4]
Janvier M.
6-17-5
R16
Halys Q.[5]
Kamke T.[12]
7-657-63
Bublik A.[4]
Choinski J.
6-46-2
Darcis S.
Bourgue M.
3-67-57-65
Gombos N.
Kolar Z.
6-757-646-3
Ofner S.[7]
Lamasine T.
6-746-37-5
Janvier M.
Miedler L.
7-626-4
Safiullin R.
Kuhn N.
6-36-4
Barrere G.[1]
Ymer M.[13]
6-36-3
R32
Kuhn N.
Brands D.[6]
6-17-65
Janvier M.
Clarke J.[11]
6-22-0
Safiullin R.
Horansky F.[9]
7-657-63
Ymer M.[13]
Torpegaard M.
1-66-26-4
Bourgue M.
Bolelli S.[2]
7-57-65
Kolar Z.
Griekspoor T.[16]
6-727-56-3
Halys Q.[5]
Vavassori A.
6-36-2
Bublik A.[4]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-46-4
Darcis S.
De Greef A.[14]
7-657-5
Kamke T.[12]
Zapata Miralles B.
6-26-3
Gombos N.
Stakhovsky S.[3]
7-644-66-1
Lamasine T.
Napolitano S.[10]
6-17-5
Ofner S.[7]
Grigelis L.
7-656-4
Miedler L.
Giustino L.[8]
4-67-686-4
Choinski J.
Pavlasek A.[15]
6-47-5
Barrere G.[1]
Serdarusic N.
7-54-66-3
R64
Darcis S.
Muller A.
6-17-63
Vavassori A.
Bonzi B.
6-37-5
Choinski J.
Gutierrez Ferrol S.
7-52-66-3
Kolar Z.
Jacq G.
6-46-4
Kuhn N.
Brancaccio R.
6-34-66-1
Bourgue M.
Masur D.
6-16-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Heller P.
6-36-3
Gombos N.
Mitjana L.
6-46-1
Lamasine T.
Furness E.
6-27-5
Grigelis L.
Taberner C.
6-44-66-3
Miedler L.
Ilkel C.
6-46-3
Janvier M.
Karlovskiy E.
7-626-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Benchetrit E.
6-12-66-3
Safiullin R.
Brown D.
3-67-646-2
Torpegaard M.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-36-3
Serdarusic N.
Viola M.
6-36-4