Daniel Evans vs Jason Jung — Indian Wells CH Quarter-final

Indian Wells CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Daniel Evans
GBR
Daniel Evans
#501ATP
1588ELO
1562Hard ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 February 2019
hard
Jason Jung
TPE14
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
Evans D.
6-4 6-4
Jung J.
Evans D.
662
Jung J.
440

Daniel Evans defeated Jason Jung 6-4 6-4 in the Indian Wells CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Daniel Evans came in ranked #501, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Daniel Evans extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Evans edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-07-22AtlantaR32hardDaniel Evans6-1 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Evans D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Jung J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Evans D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Evans D.Jung J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
2.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Evans D.Jung J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
73
21
Break points saved·Dominant
97
64
Break points won·Dominant
61
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
21
Tiebreaks·Even
66
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Evans D.Jung J.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
78

Evans D.: 20 days rest · Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Edmund K.[1]
Rublev A.[7]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Edmund K.[1]
Harris L.[5]
6-24-66-1
Rublev A.[7]
Evans D.
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Edmund K.[1]
Maden Y.[8]
3-66-06-3
Evans D.
Jung J.[14]
6-46-4
Rublev A.[7]
Bolt A.[13]
6-46-3
Harris L.[5]
Caruso S.
7-646-3
R16
Evans D.
Giraldo S.
6-16-2
Harris L.[5]
Young D.
6-46-2
Maden Y.[8]
Majchrzak K.
6-27-5
Jung J.[14]
Krajinovic F.[2]
7-56-3
Bolt A.[13]
Donskoy E.[4]
6-33-67-5
Rublev A.[7]
Polansky P.[11]
6-27-5
Caruso S.
Redlicki M.
7-682-67-61
Edmund K.[1]
Rosol L.[16]
6-36-4
R32
Giraldo S.
Donaldson J.[9]
6-22-66-4
Rosol L.[16]
Watanuki Y.
7-657-66
Edmund K.[1]
Robredo T.
6-46-4
Redlicki M.
Blanch U.
6-33-66-1
Krajinovic F.[2]
Aragone J.
6-23-67-5
Jung J.[14]
Krueger M.
6-16-4
Evans D.
Istomin D.[6]
6-46-4
Donskoy E.[4]
Zopp J.
6-37-63
Bolt A.[13]
Krstin P.
6-36-4
Polansky P.[11]
Harrison C.
6-43-67-64
Rublev A.[7]
Smith J.
6-27-5
Harris L.[5]
Eubanks C.
7-656-746-0
Young D.
Laaksonen H.[10]
7-53-66-4
Caruso S.
Lacko L.[15]
4-66-36-1
Maden Y.[8]
Escobedo E.
7-636-3
Majchrzak K.
Kecmanovic M.[12]
6-26-3
R64
Krueger M.
Milojevic N.
7-56-4
Giraldo S.
Novikov D.
7-55-76-2
Evans D.
Cressy M.
6-47-5
Zopp J.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-2
Eubanks C.
Giron M.
7-56-3
Aragone J.
Nakashima B.
6-16-4
Krstin P.
Bemelmans R.
6-36-4
Harrison C.
Smyczek T.
6-44-66-3
Smith J.
Rubin N.
6-726-36-4
Young D.
Kwiatkowski T.
4-66-17-64
Caruso S.
Quiroz R.
7-56-2
Blanch U.
Brooksby J.
4-66-26-2
Escobedo E.
Redlicki M.
6-37-63
Majchrzak K.
King D.
6-46-3
Watanuki Y.
Khan Z.
3-66-26-2
Robredo T.
Koepfer D.
4-67-56-2