Kyle Edmund vs Andrey Rublev — Indian Wells CH Final

Indian Wells CH · CHALLENGER · Final
GBR1
Kyle Edmund
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 February 2019
hard
Andrey Rublev
RUS7
Andrey Rublev
#16ATP
1902ELO
1849Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
Edmund K.
6-3 6-2
Rublev A.
Edmund K.
662
Rublev A.
320

Kyle Edmund defeated Andrey Rublev 6-3 6-2 in the Indian Wells CH final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Edmund K.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Rublev A.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Edmund K.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Edmund K.Rublev A.
—
Serve
55
—
Return
49

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Edmund K.Rublev A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
66%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.4
7.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (131 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Edmund K.Rublev A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
88
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
100
Break points won·Dominant
21
72
Deciding sets·Dominant
25
97
Tiebreaks·Dominant
36
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Edmund K.Rublev A.
Freshness·
—
100

Rublev A.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Edmund K.[1]
Rublev A.[7]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Edmund K.[1]
Harris L.[5]
6-24-66-1
Rublev A.[7]
Evans D.
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Edmund K.[1]
Maden Y.[8]
3-66-06-3
Evans D.
Jung J.[14]
6-46-4
Rublev A.[7]
Bolt A.[13]
6-46-3
Harris L.[5]
Caruso S.
7-646-3
R16
Evans D.
Giraldo S.
6-16-2
Harris L.[5]
Young D.
6-46-2
Maden Y.[8]
Majchrzak K.
6-27-5
Jung J.[14]
Krajinovic F.[2]
7-56-3
Bolt A.[13]
Donskoy E.[4]
6-33-67-5
Rublev A.[7]
Polansky P.[11]
6-27-5
Caruso S.
Redlicki M.
7-682-67-61
Edmund K.[1]
Rosol L.[16]
6-36-4
R32
Giraldo S.
Donaldson J.[9]
6-22-66-4
Rosol L.[16]
Watanuki Y.
7-657-66
Edmund K.[1]
Robredo T.
6-46-4
Redlicki M.
Blanch U.
6-33-66-1
Krajinovic F.[2]
Aragone J.
6-23-67-5
Jung J.[14]
Krueger M.
6-16-4
Evans D.
Istomin D.[6]
6-46-4
Donskoy E.[4]
Zopp J.
6-37-63
Bolt A.[13]
Krstin P.
6-36-4
Polansky P.[11]
Harrison C.
6-43-67-64
Rublev A.[7]
Smith J.
6-27-5
Harris L.[5]
Eubanks C.
7-656-746-0
Young D.
Laaksonen H.[10]
7-53-66-4
Caruso S.
Lacko L.[15]
4-66-36-1
Maden Y.[8]
Escobedo E.
7-636-3
Majchrzak K.
Kecmanovic M.[12]
6-26-3
R64
Krueger M.
Milojevic N.
7-56-4
Giraldo S.
Novikov D.
7-55-76-2
Evans D.
Cressy M.
6-47-5
Zopp J.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-2
Eubanks C.
Giron M.
7-56-3
Aragone J.
Nakashima B.
6-16-4
Krstin P.
Bemelmans R.
6-36-4
Harrison C.
Smyczek T.
6-44-66-3
Smith J.
Rubin N.
6-726-36-4
Young D.
Kwiatkowski T.
4-66-17-64
Caruso S.
Quiroz R.
7-56-2
Blanch U.
Brooksby J.
4-66-26-2
Escobedo E.
Redlicki M.
6-37-63
Majchrzak K.
King D.
6-46-3
Watanuki Y.
Khan Z.
3-66-26-2
Robredo T.
Koepfer D.
4-67-56-2