Tatsuma Ito vs Moez Echargui — Yokohama CH Round of 32

Yokohama CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
JPN1
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 February 2019
hard
Moez Echargui
TUN
Moez Echargui
#151ATP
1416ELO
1408Hard ELO
$171kYTD
$469kCAREER
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Ito T.
6-0 7-5
Echargui M.
Ito T.
672
Echargui M.
050

Tatsuma Ito defeated Moez Echargui 6-0 7-5 in the Yokohama CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tatsuma Ito came in defending last year's final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ito T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Echargui M.

Echargui M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ito T.Echargui M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.9
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (130 vs 195). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ito T.Echargui M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
24
4
Break points saved·Clear edge
61
48
Break points won·Even
9
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
4
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
48
42

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ito T.Echargui M.
Freshness·
—
100

Echargui M.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kwon S.[11]
Otte O.[2]
7-646-3
Semi-finals
Otte O.[2]
Harris A.
6-36-4
Kwon S.[11]
Sugita Y.[3]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Otte O.[2]
Mager G.[10]
6-26-4
Sugita Y.[3]
Sela D.[8]
2-66-47-5
Harris A.
Yang T.
7-57-64
Kwon S.[11]
Lee D.
6-16-0
R16
Otte O.[2]
Purcell M.
1-67-56-4
Yang T.
Rodionov J.[6]
6-46-4
Mager G.[10]
Soeda G.[7]
3-67-57-5
Harris A.
Elias G.
6-45-76-4
Sela D.[8]
Rola B.[9]
6-36-1
Kwon S.[11]
Moraing M.[5]
6-26-4
Lee D.
Ito T.[1]
6-34-67-67
Sugita Y.[3]
Peliwo F.[14]
6-46-2
R32
Mager G.[10]
Tseng C.
7-637-65
Purcell M.
Troicki V.[15]
7-57-65
Rola B.[9]
Uchida K.
7-636-4
Elias G.
Clezar G.[13]
0-66-27-64
Yang T.
Cachin P.[12]
6-46-4
Ito T.[1]
Echargui M.
6-07-5
Moraing M.[5]
Wang T.
7-686-2
Rodionov J.[6]
Perez Sanz D.
7-670-66-4
Otte O.[2]
Bai Y.
6-36-2
Soeda G.[7]
Kim C.
6-16-4
Harris A.
Moriya H.[4]
6-36-3
Sela D.[8]
Saville L.
6-26-0
Peliwo F.[14]
Gakhov I.
6-26-4
Kwon S.[11]
Imamura M.
6-26-2
Sugita Y.[3]
Nguyen D.
2-66-47-5
Lee D.
Couacaud E.[16]
6-06-2
R64
Elias G.
Wu D.
6-43-66-2
Saville L.
Uesugi K.
2-66-46-2
Tseng C.
Mansouri S.
6-43-66-3
Wang T.
Hazawa S.
7-626-4
Perez Sanz D.
Imai S.
6-26-3
Yang T.
Chung Y.
6-46-3
Lee D.
Xia Z.
6-06-3
Uchida K.
Smith R.
6-36-3
Gakhov I.
Oliveira G.
6-37-65
Nguyen D.
Ellis B.
3-67-57-5
Imamura M.
Tokuda R.
7-56-2
Echargui M.
Takahashi Y.
7-55-76-2
Kim C.
Kai N.
6-16-3
Bai Y.
Ochi M.
6-20-67-5
Purcell M.
King K.
6-26-2