Gastao Elias vs Guilherme Clezar — Yokohama CH Round of 32

Yokohama CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Gastao Elias
POR
Gastao Elias
#728ATP
1447ELO
1419Hard ELO
35 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 February 2019
hard
BRA13
Guilherme Clezar
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
Elias G.
0-6 6-2 7-6
Clezar G.
Elias G.
06772
Clezar G.
62641

Gastao Elias defeated Guilherme Clezar 0-6 6-2 7-6 in the Yokohama CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Gastao Elias came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Gastao Elias extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-02-08Buenos AiresQ2clayGastao Elias7-5 7-6(9)

Serve vs return

This season
Elias G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Clezar G.

Clezar G.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Elias G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Elias G.Clezar G.
1st serve in·Clear edge
55%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Even
3.1
3.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 91). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Elias G.Clezar G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
37
12
Break points saved·Slight edge
57
65
Break points won·Clear edge
24
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
19
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
7
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kwon S.[11]
Otte O.[2]
7-646-3
Semi-finals
Otte O.[2]
Harris A.
6-36-4
Kwon S.[11]
Sugita Y.[3]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Otte O.[2]
Mager G.[10]
6-26-4
Sugita Y.[3]
Sela D.[8]
2-66-47-5
Harris A.
Yang T.
7-57-64
Kwon S.[11]
Lee D.
6-16-0
R16
Otte O.[2]
Purcell M.
1-67-56-4
Yang T.
Rodionov J.[6]
6-46-4
Mager G.[10]
Soeda G.[7]
3-67-57-5
Harris A.
Elias G.
6-45-76-4
Sela D.[8]
Rola B.[9]
6-36-1
Kwon S.[11]
Moraing M.[5]
6-26-4
Lee D.
Ito T.[1]
6-34-67-67
Sugita Y.[3]
Peliwo F.[14]
6-46-2
R32
Mager G.[10]
Tseng C.
7-637-65
Purcell M.
Troicki V.[15]
7-57-65
Rola B.[9]
Uchida K.
7-636-4
Elias G.
Clezar G.[13]
0-66-27-64
Yang T.
Cachin P.[12]
6-46-4
Ito T.[1]
Echargui M.
6-07-5
Moraing M.[5]
Wang T.
7-686-2
Rodionov J.[6]
Perez Sanz D.
7-670-66-4
Otte O.[2]
Bai Y.
6-36-2
Soeda G.[7]
Kim C.
6-16-4
Harris A.
Moriya H.[4]
6-36-3
Sela D.[8]
Saville L.
6-26-0
Peliwo F.[14]
Gakhov I.
6-26-4
Kwon S.[11]
Imamura M.
6-26-2
Sugita Y.[3]
Nguyen D.
2-66-47-5
Lee D.
Couacaud E.[16]
6-06-2
R64
Elias G.
Wu D.
6-43-66-2
Saville L.
Uesugi K.
2-66-46-2
Tseng C.
Mansouri S.
6-43-66-3
Wang T.
Hazawa S.
7-626-4
Perez Sanz D.
Imai S.
6-26-3
Yang T.
Chung Y.
6-46-3
Lee D.
Xia Z.
6-06-3
Uchida K.
Smith R.
6-36-3
Gakhov I.
Oliveira G.
6-37-65
Nguyen D.
Ellis B.
3-67-57-5
Imamura M.
Tokuda R.
7-56-2
Echargui M.
Takahashi Y.
7-55-76-2
Kim C.
Kai N.
6-16-3
Bai Y.
Ochi M.
6-20-67-5
Purcell M.
King K.
6-26-2